Crosby 1 assist in 4 games

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
25,967
5,835
Visit site
How is that relevant to this topic?

It's as relevant as Crosby's performance against CBJ two years ago. You chimed in to try to back up the assertion that Crosby only produces against weaker defensive teams in the early rounds is therefore not worthy of being considered for the Top 5 player at any point. I am showing that Crosby has done everything in the playoffs you would want from an a great offensive talent complimented with a solid 2-way game. That'

If you think his statline from the CBJ series wasn't reflective of his performance, I will point to other series where he should have had more points.

This stuff evens out over the course of 13 seasons worth of playoffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZeroPucksGiven

NoMessi

Registered User
Jan 2, 2009
1,697
453
It's as relevant as Crosby's performance against CBJ two years ago. You chimed in to try to back up the assertion that Crosby only produces against weaker defensive teams in the early rounds is therefore not worthy of being considered for the Top 5 player at any point. I am showing that Crosby has done everything in the playoffs you would want from an a great offensive talent complimented with a solid 2-way game. That'

If you think his statline from the CBJ series wasn't reflective of his performance, I will point to other series where he should have had more points.

This stuff evens out over the course of 13 seasons worth of playoffs.

How far from the truth. You need a serious diagnosis to put those words in my mouth.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
25,967
5,835
Visit site
How far from the truth. You need a serious diagnosis to put those words in my mouth.

I assumed you understood the context of my post before you decided to comment.

In any event, Crosby certainly added nothing to his resume this past playoffs. He will have to be content with likely his 7th Hart nomination to bolster his claim as the best player of his era and move closer to #5 all-time.
 

NoMessi

Registered User
Jan 2, 2009
1,697
453
I assumed you understood the context of my post before you decided to comment.

In any event, Crosby certainly added nothing to his resume this past playoffs. He will have to be content with likely his 7th Hart nomination to bolster his claim as the best player of his era and move closer to #5 all-time.

You context was irrelevant to what weve been discussing.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
25,967
5,835
Visit site
You context was irrelevant to what weve been discussing.

The context was that Crosby feasts on weak goaltending/defensive teams or less relevant first round opponents so your point about CBJ is irrelevant. You only need to look at his point totals in the context of the discussion. He was successful against the #2 defensive team. Your point about his overall is meaningless.

The irony is that now this first round series is apparently relevant moreso than the ones where Crosby dominated.
 

NoMessi

Registered User
Jan 2, 2009
1,697
453
The context was that Crosby feasts on weak goaltending/defensive teams or less relevant first round opponents so your point about CBJ is irrelevant. You only need to look at his point totals in the context of the discussion. He was successful against the #2 defensive team. Your point about his overall is meaningless.

The irony is that now this first round series is apparently relevant moreso than the ones where Crosby dominated.

Can you please start quoting me. I mean, nothing you say is relevant to anything im writing.
 

kugelbahn

Registered User
Feb 15, 2018
358
471
Here are goose-egg percentages for the top guys, ie games without point in playoffs:

Crosby - 36%
Malkin - 38%
OV - 34%
Kane - 36%
Toews - 43%
Kopitar - 37%
 
Last edited:

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,583
10,366
Here are goose-egg percentages for the top guys, ie games without point in playoffs:

Crosby - 36%
Malkin - 38%
OV - 34%
Kane - 36%
Toews - 43%
Kopitar - 37%

Pretty sure we will have another thread on these results right?:popcorn:
 

Lomez

Too Awesome for Top 100
Mar 29, 2009
7,412
1,075
PGH, PA
Threads like these are microcosms for humanity's inevitable failure.

Anonymous people acting like children and reveling in sensationalised nonsense.

Every great player has a bad series or even a few.

It's true of literally every all time great. Past or present.

Just be thankful we get to see players of this caliber on a regular basis.

Wow, we have an adult posting! Nice!
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
25,967
5,835
Visit site
Do you really want to bring up the first round in 2017 against CBJ when he got destroyed by first Dubinskys line and then Karlssons line? He had one fairly good game, he was one of the worst on the ice for the rest of the series. Ill give you that he was the best player on the ice against Capitals though.

As per your request, here is your first quote.

Your subjective opinion on Crosby's performance has no relevance to the fact that he produced against the #2 defensive team unless we want to look at other series where he did not produce good numbers despite being one of the Pens best players on the ice. The 2016 SCF, like his whole playoffs, saw him play an excellent 2-way game with many clutch plays. The 2009 SCF also comes to mind.

As I said, he has played enough playoff games while being the best offensive and overall player on a team that has had the most success of his era. There should be no doubt that his numbers completely speak for themselves. If there is any player who we can say "singlehandedly" won a series for his team, it's Crosby. Cherrypicking a series or two using hyperbolic words like "destroyed" to try build a narrative looks foolish.

And this does not even get into the fact he has carried lesser talented linemates to help his team create depth, a key in both of their last Cup wins.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
25,967
5,835
Visit site
It's actually 4+16=20 and that point total is tied with Gretzky and Hossa for the highest total in SCF since 1987-88 season so in the past 30+ years.

Also I should probably point out that Gordie Howe, consensus top-5 player of all-time, is also sub-PPG in the SCF. And Jean Beliveau, the one player who has widely been regarded as the player Crosby needs to beat to claim that 5th spot, is also sub-PPG in the SCF. Crosby's PPG in the SCF in practically identical with the likes of Maurice Richard and Mark Messier, two other all-time greats, whom many consider as top-10 forwards of all-time. Both of these are considered as superb playoff performers, winners in every definition of the word.

It's easy to throw out Crosby's stat totals and claim that they don't fit a status of someone who should be considered as top-5 player of all-time when not even looking at stats of other players Crosby competes for that claim.

Wait a second, are you telling me that @DickSmehlik did not do any research on the other #5 player candidates before posting? I am schocked.
 

ZeroPucksGiven

Registered User
Feb 28, 2017
6,338
4,275
That series likely goes the CBJ way if the whistle is blown on the Werenski headshot.

"Headshot"
Framed to insinuate and spun a Pens player hit the poor dude in the head

When in fact a slapshot ramps up his stick and fells him, in which case the ref isn't obligated to blow the whistle until the injured player's team gets possession.

"When a player is injured so that he cannot continue play or go to
his bench, the play shall not be stopped until the injured player’s team
has secured control of the puck. If the player’s team is in control of the
puck at the time of injury, play shall be stopped immediately unless his
team is in a scoring position."

It's ok man, I'm sure next decade you'll get over this loss...
 

heysmilinstrange

Registered User
Nov 10, 2016
3,321
4,768
And this is what Daver does. He swings a debate to something irrelevant. I only stated that he was bad, not how bad or if someone else was worse. I did include that all Penguins players did bad though.

And watch the statline again against CBJ. Im talking about eye-test, but the numbers supported my claim. Its strange that you think he was better than Malkin. Malkin was +7, Crosby was -2. Crosby was a minus player every game except 1, Malkin was a plus player all games except 1 where he was +/- 0. Crosby first played against dubinsky but was demolished and they switched so Karlsson played him, demolished again. Malkin had 11 points, Crosby had 7. Crosby was Terrible - the end. That doesnt mean I think he was terrible for the entire playoffs, I think he was great after the first round. But thats something ive seen plenty of times and no one ever reads that part. Especially Daver ofc.

Calling 7 points in 5 games a "terrible" performance doesn't compute, sorry. It's like when Flyers fans say Couturier shut down Malkin in 2012--he scored 8 points in 6 games that year.
 

Sentinel

Registered User
May 26, 2009
12,854
4,706
New Jersey
www.vvinenglish.com
I assumed you understood the context of my post before you decided to comment.

In any event, Crosby certainly added nothing to his resume this past playoffs. He will have to be content with likely his 7th Hart nomination to bolster his claim as the best player of his era and move closer to #5 all-time.
How about "he subtracted a tangible something from his resume these playoffs"?
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
22,320
15,017
How about "he subtracted a tangible something from his resume these playoffs"?

I don't believe in subtracting for bad performances. I think very few people do that. The problem with this exercise is that every player has bad series/stretches and it's a lot harder to keep track of those, than to just add the positives up.

Maybe if there's a trend with a player you can start subtracting as a negative (example Stamkos with quite a few playoff under performances). Don't think you can say that about Crosby though.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
25,967
5,835
Visit site
That's a major part of the debate on the threads debating him as a top 5 player. At least that's the implication when people bring up his Gold Medals and Cups as an individual achievement.

He has a great argument to be heading towards #5 all-time without mentioning whether he has won any Cups or not.
 

mikeyp24

Registered User
Jun 28, 2014
5,959
1,231
"Headshot"
Framed to insinuate and spun a Pens player hit the poor dude in the head

When in fact a slapshot ramps up his stick and fells him, in which case the ref isn't obligated to blow the whistle until the injured player's team gets possession.

"When a player is injured so that he cannot continue play or go to
his bench, the play shall not be stopped until the injured player’s team
has secured control of the puck. If the player’s team is in control of the
puck at the time of injury, play shall be stopped immediately unless his
team is in a scoring position."

It's ok man, I'm sure next decade you'll get over this loss...
Either that game or next a pens player is hit in the back of the head with a puck and goes down they instantly blew the whistle while Z laid in a puddle of blood. Not spun to make it seem intentional just saying the kid had part of his skull broken and they didnt stop it leading directly to a goal and they then changed their own rules literally the very series to instantly blown dead. And Im not made or upset they lost the series it has built character in our team. This moment for the cbj isnt huge if we rightfully won the pens series. That series on the other hand strengthened MAF career and Malkin and Kessel showed to be the most inportant guys on the team yet again cementing their legacy of being the reason Sid could celebrate 2 more trophies.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad