oilers'72
Registered User
Colour me shocked! How could it happen in China of all places?
China Fights Coronavirus Explosion Weeks After Wuhan New Year's Bash
China Fights Coronavirus Explosion Weeks After Wuhan New Year's Bash
WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.
WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information
Yes the second derivative will tell you where you are headed.I'll explain as I did the math yesterday.
The peak 7-day average for new cases was on December 7 at 1795. 15 days later the 7-day average was 1314, and 21 days later 994. A drop of 481 out of 1795 is 27%. A drop of 801 cases out of 1795 is 45% (Doing it quickly yesterday I must plugged a number in wrong to get 40% instead of 44.6%, I apologize for the error).
The average 7-day active number peaked on 20,503 on December 14th. 15 days later it was 16,459 and 21 days later 14,429. A drop of 4044 out of 20,503 is 19.7% and a drop of 6074 out of 20,503 is 29.6% (yesterday I mistakenly used December 13th which was 20502 which accounts for the descrepancy as yesterday calculations essentially had an extra day due to how close the numbers were at the two day peak).
The peak 7-day ICU average was 149 cases on December 29 (21 days prior to the numbers announced yesterday average is now 125) and the peak 7-day average non-ICU hospitalization was 789 on January 4th (15 days prior to the numbers announced yesterday and the average is now 653).
I refuse to use single day peaks due to the nature of the reporting being that some days less testing is completed or somedays were catchup days, which is why I use the 7-day averages instead of single day peaks.
I think the more relevant number here is the rate of drop for active cases as that kind of captures the average life of the illness and the rate of drop for hospitalization in general is decreasing at similar level albeit a bit higher which is intuitive because hospitalization are naturally more severe instances of the disease.
So my point was only that the rate of decrease for hospitalizations since peaking seems logical, but I'm in your boat completely about why it took so long to peak after the new cases or even active cases peaked. I always like going back to Italy because of the volume they had in the first wave and I have that available on my hard drive, and though it took a long time for new cases to diminish after restrictions, deaths peaked within about a week and ICU peaked about 10 days later, but active cases took closer to four weeks to peak. I suspect the lag for active cases at the time was that it took longer back then to comfortably say someone had beat it, but I don't understand why the peak severe outcomes took so much longer unless it is solely due to the large number of deaths that occured more quickly in Italy.
That is unlikely.It could also point to potentially more complicated cases here.
I agree, I think it points to the people who most need hospitals care due to having Covid and severe complications from Covid being able to have the best level of care being made available to them instead of sending them home to fend for themselves and potentially spread it in the community.That is unlikely.
lol, what does this mean?WHO Information Notice for IVD Users 2020/05
Shifting the goalposts once again. Interesting timing, to say the least.
Would this even apply to an MRNA vaccine?
And now comes the whining when they have to come back to Canada under the new tougher regulations.There goes the Florida Vaccine vacay trips..
turned the tap off, had to see that coming.
Florida cracks down on 'vaccine tourists,' requiring proof of residency for COVID-19 shots (msn.com)
And now comes the whining when they have to come back to Canada under the new tougher regulations.
I'm referring to Trudeau sending out a warning shot the other day, that there could be newer, even tougher restrictions for out of country travellers. Spoke to someone who's friends just came back from Mexico, and they had to get the negative test twice, as it wasn't accepted at the airport. Cost them a total of $1100.What new, tougher regulations?
My fiancée just flew back to Canada last week and she was worried because we sold our house just before we left so all her identification still has our old address on it but she is living at her sisters place until our new place is completed. She had all her info and plans sorted out for them because she thought they’d grill her. Lol nope all she had to do was present a negative test before boarding and she said going through re entry customs was basically the same as usual. I got a good laugh at her expense.
What new, tougher regulations?
My fiancée just flew back to Canada last week and she was worried because we sold our house just before we left so all her identification still has our old address on it but she is living at her sisters place until our new place is completed. She had all her info and plans sorted out for them because she thought they’d grill her. Lol nope all she had to do was present a negative test before boarding and she said going through re entry customs was basically the same as usual. I got a good laugh at her expense.
Colour me shocked! How could it happen in China of all places?
China Fights Coronavirus Explosion Weeks After Wuhan New Year's Bash
Public sentiment is very much against holding the Olympics this year. I haven’t spoken to a single person who wants them to go ahead. There are some in government however who have a vested interest in seeing the Games go on and to the surprise of no one they are acting like it’s still a possibility. Fortunately they don’t make the call and I fully expect that the IOC will issue a further postponement.Rumblings that the Tokyo Olympics will be cancelled (or delayed another year).
If you have about 50K to spend you could still pull it off.There goes the Florida Vaccine vacay trips..
If you have about 50K to spend you could still pull it off.
An exclusive UK travel club is offering its wealthy members international getaways to receive coronavirus vaccinations
I'm referring to Trudeau sending out a warning shot the other day, that there could be newer, even tougher restrictions for out of country travellers. Spoke to someone who's friends just came back from Mexico, and they had to get the negative test twice, as it wasn't accepted at the airport. Cost them a total of $1100.
BTW, wasn't taking a shot at you or your girlfriend, and sounds like a legit reason.