Bryanbryoil
Pray For Ukraine
- Sep 13, 2004
- 86,154
- 34,461
You know what's fun to do?
Find a hard surfaced chair, that's been placed on a hard surfaces floor, and unashamefully let one rip n feel the chair vibrate into the floor and the walls while the sound reverberates through the room. And then have the wife come to yell at you because we're out in public but she stops mid sentence while the smell begins to ass-sualt her nasal senses to the point it's burning her nose hairs, thus forcing her to have to turn away and run from the area.
Not sure if this has been posted yet, but it is apparently a big deal based on the group having done the research (one of the most prominent in the field), the method (looking at not only antibodies but also t-cells) and the conclusions. Robust (not complete) immunity to Covid19 lasts at least 5-8 months.
News article: https://www.businessinsider.com/long-term-coronavirus-immunity-months-years-2020-11
The study: Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection | Science
It's been out for less than a week, but I guess that can be called a little while.Its been out for a little while. Good evidence with speculation that if you've had covid you'll have long term immunity. Of course no way to prove that, but people who contracted SARS in 2003 are immune to SARS-cov-2 now. 17 years later. That's why this insistence on not going for herd immunity was ridiculous from the beginning. Literally worst case scenario is you only get 1 year immunity, best case we never see this disease again. Now with the SA variant hitting younger kids, it's even dumber that they weren't exposed to the less lethal version of the virus. Potentially saving quite a few young lives.
It's been out for less than a week, but I guess that can be called a little while.
Literally the worst case scenario according to this study is that you get 5-8 months robust immunity. The rest are just your assumptions. That last one about saving young lives by exposing more people earlier is missing so much context that it is just ridiculous, jmo though.
Would you mind explaining this to those of us that don’t understand this sort of stuff?
Pfizer already says theirs works on both variants, despite it not being 100% proven or concluded with 100% certainty.
Pfizer says its coronavirus vaccine appears to work against U.K., South Africa variants
That is also what we may not have with the South African strain. I thought you were the one shooting down fear mongering here, so far every official source says that while it is more transmissible there is no evidence that these variants cause more severe illness or increased risk of death. Your question is not really relevant to be honest, they did not know at the time, they could make educated guesses, but they did not know. Also kids don't live in a bubble. Parents, grandparents, teachers, etc. It was about reducing transmission to others, not about specifically protecting the kids, you know that.Well if the virus mutates right now and starts killing children do you think policy makers made the right decision to try and shield them from the virus? Knowing they'd have long term immunity if they caught the current virus which gives them mild symptoms? Because that's what we may have with the South African Variant.
And I feel, I read the study more then a week ago. I want to say it came out around December 28th, another study showing 6 months immunity also came out in early December IIRC.
Bamlanivimab
Basically that when the overall positivity rate goes down, the false positivity rate goes up.Would you mind explaining this to those of us that don’t understand this sort of stuff?
Ya makes senseBasically that when the overall positivity rate goes down, the false positivity rate goes up.
Not a smoking gun of any kind
Not enough people were frightened to be in favour of the vaccine(s) initially.