hockeykicker
Moderator
- Dec 3, 2014
- 35,205
- 12,809
Ok whatever that was, lets stop that. We aren't discussing russian hacking, nazi's, who landed on the moon, who got money, politics etc. Try and stay on topic
Last edited:
Trump's four executive orders to lower drug prices: What to know — Fox Business
What say you Dave? Since you’re in the industry.
Starting to wonder if the NHL is just trying to fit in a season to satisfy a year of their broadcasting deal.
This season is ridiculous. They're putting the players, coaches, trainers, etc. at risk of a debilitating disease for no apparent reason.
Yeah see post above. Shady.Not just satisfy, but to negotiate a new US TV contract with a stronger position than if they just canceled the season. NBC's 10-year contract is finished after this season.
I’m sure it would be a rotation. Similar to what other sports (mostly college) have doneWait what? As in fully substituting the Sabres with the Flyers, or were they planning to rotate a future Flyers-Caps date with a Sabres-Caps one?
I suspected this immediately. Googled it. Now convinced this is the reason:
View attachment 394113
Expect TV Rights Fees For Sports To Soar
I assume there's a "force majeure" clause in the contract that would've pushed the final year of the deal if the season fell short of X games and the NHL wants this year to count so they can find a new rights deal.
So the answer is $$$$$ even as they cry poor (their claim of losing billions).
I simply cannot share the discontent here. The NHL is easily the weakest of the 4 Pro Sports leagues. If they took off another season, who knows that the landscape would look like upon their return. TV money is a HUGE deal for the leagues ability to not only “make it” as currently constructed, but to stay relevant in the national psyche by being in front of viewers.
no one is forcing players/coaches etc to be involved. They want to opt out (and not get paid), they can. Each their own.
We also need to realize they are all playing their childhood dreams, and even a 10yr career would be cut short by 10% by not playing. Most don’t have near that type of NHL career length.
if I was a player, I’m pretty sure I’d want to play, unless something was really wrong w my family etc.
But that’s just me.
The players in these strict rules are safer than the vast majority of people needing to go to work every day. Also the risk to 28 year old athletes is pretty low.This season is ridiculous. They're putting the players, coaches, trainers, etc. at risk of a debilitating disease for no apparent reason.
Trying to keep a league afloat is shady? If they sat out, lost millions, got taken on a lost TV year because the contract rolled, and the league suffered, you all would call them idiots and incompetent.Yeah see post above. Shady.
Because of course...
I take your point but I disagree about the bolded. Maybe not "forcing" but coercing for sure. I'm sure they could opt out, but at what cost if everyone else is going to work? It's the same with everyone who is working during the pandemic in some respects. Beyond that, who's to say that Kuzy or some other player doesn't end up disabled for life, like so many of the "long haulers"?? Is that really a risk worth taking?
And more than that, it's not just players. It's trainers, staff, janitorial crew...they aren't making millions. They don't have much of a choice. If there's work for them, they have to show up. They can't opt out. If there wasn't work, they'd be eligible for unemployment assistance, but with the league open, they aren't. They have to put themselves and their families at risk.
But ultimately, it's about the almighty dollar, as @g00n and @tenken00 have identified, and not "The Game" or saving careers or any other noble-sounding thing.
This season is ridiculous. They're putting the players, coaches, trainers, etc. at risk of a debilitating disease for no apparent reason.
No season equals no pay for all of the lower level people you mentioned. They will mostly either get furloughed or laid off. So how is that better? They can either look for a new job now (while having a job), or look for a new job now (while *not* having a job). It’s all personal choice, IMO. Same w the players. They sit out a year and take care of themselves. They either come back, get traded, or become FA’s. None of which is horrible. People in everyday life get transferred all the time. You either accept it, or you don’t.Because of course...
I take your point but I disagree about the bolded. Maybe not "forcing" but coercing for sure. I'm sure they could opt out, but at what cost if everyone else is going to work? It's the same with everyone who is working during the pandemic in some respects. Beyond that, who's to say that Kuzy or some other player doesn't end up disabled for life, like so many of the "long haulers"?? Is that really a risk worth taking?
And more than that, it's not just players. It's trainers, staff, janitorial crew...they aren't making millions. They don't have much of a choice. If there's work for them, they have to show up. They can't opt out. If there wasn't work, they'd be eligible for unemployment assistance, but with the league open, they aren't. They have to put themselves and their families at risk.
But ultimately, it's about the almighty dollar, as @g00n and @tenken00 have identified, and not "The Game" or saving careers or any other noble-sounding thing.
so because he plays a physical sport any risk is acceptable?what is more likely? Kuzy having long term issues because of COVID, or because he got checked to the head, or went funny into the boards?
As I said, without a job they are eligible for assistance, which comes without the risk of a deadly virus. They don't have that option now.No season equals no pay for all of the lower level people you mentioned. They will mostly either get furloughed or laid off. So how is that better? They can either look for a new job now (while having a job), or look for a new job now (while *not* having a job). It’s all personal choice, IMO. Same w the players. They sit out a year and take care of themselves. They either come back, get traded, or become FA’s. None of which is horrible. People in everyday life get transferred all the time. You either accept it, or you don’t.
All business are dealing with this. Sadly. Sink or swim. The NHL is trying to swim, IMO
that’s all I’m saying.
so because he plays a physical sport any risk is acceptable?
Trying to keep a league afloat is shady? If they sat out, lost millions, got taken on a lost TV year because the contract rolled, and the league suffered, you all would call them idiots and incompetent.
Is serving food in a parking lot to keep a restaurant going shady? Is dropping a product because it’s not making your business money shady? People seem quick to call smart business decisions greedy or shady, yet if it’s their own bank account.... different story.
Yeah, Kuzy maybe isn't the best example. LOLIsn’t it Kuzy’s risk to accept or not?
Lol he certainly doesn’t seem all that concerned COUGH***covid list***COUGH...
No season equals no pay for all of the lower level people you mentioned. They will mostly either get furloughed or laid off. So how is that better? They can either look for a new job now (while having a job), or look for a new job now (while *not* having a job). It’s all personal choice, IMO. Same w the players. They sit out a year and take care of themselves. They either come back, get traded, or become FA’s. None of which is horrible. People in everyday life get transferred all the time. You either accept it, or you don’t.
All business are dealing with this. Sadly. Sink or swim. The NHL is trying to swim, IMO
that’s all I’m saying.