Gurglesons
Registered User
I'd consider Calgary a fast team. I wouldn't consider Boston a slow team whatsoever. I don't watch enough Sharks games to comment so I'll just go with you on that one. It sort of brings up an interesting question; What makes a fast team? The number of guys who can skate fast? We didn't exactly have a full lineup of speedsters a la NHL 94. We had a few, sprinkled throughout the lineup, but the more important thing is that we played fast. I wouldn't consider Sid or Geno blazing fast anymore, but they have a gear they can reach where they push the pace. We used to have this killer instinct, aggressive style where we were constantly on the counter attack. Things seem so much more stale and structured now. I don't know if that's a roster composition thing, or a coaching thing, or guys just not giving a **** as much anymore (which I suppose leads back to coaching).
I don't think we were a fast team because we had Hags, an engaged Kessel, and Rust. I think we were a fast team because of our style of play, which fell in line with having guys like Hags, Phil, and Rust. It also doesn't help that Schultz is struggling as much as Phil all season, maybe worse. That's a big missing piece in terms of being able to play fast, the transition game Schultz can bring. Especially with Letang battling his neck/spine thing. It doesn't matter much if we have speedy forwards, to be fair, when our transition game is on the stick of guys like Maatta, JJ, Gudbranson and Trotman.
Rough stuff.
I agree with all of this.
I just think people are too quick (lol) to blame our problems on speed. Speed isn’t speed, speed is playing fast as you described and without Schultz, Letang and yes even Maatta our transistion game as expected is a disaster.