SpeedyPotato
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2012
- 2,581
- 2,404
Man I know he's not gonna play game 1 and it pisses me off.
4 goals in 10 games. On pace for over 20 in 56 games. Only Toffoli and Gallagher have scored at that pace.
But let's leave him in the stands. We need the extra player that's good defensively but can't do shit in the offensive zone.
I’d sit TatarAny of these players should sit so that Caufield can play:
Ducharme is a bad coach, but he's not that bad that he'd sit one of our best offensive players just because he's a rookie. (I don't think he is at least).
- Armia
- Byron
- Lehkonen
- Tatar
4 goals in 10 games. On pace for over 20 in 56 games. Only Toffoli and Gallagher have scored at that pace.
But let's leave him in the stands. We need the extra player that's good defensively but can't do shit in the offensive zone.
I’d sit Tatar
Of all the dumb shit this organization has done, sitting Caufield for the playoffs might be the dumbest of all. And we've seen the org do plenty of dumb shit lol. I wont believe it til I see it, it's just too dumb to not play him
With Toffoli, Caufield is our best sniper.Of all the dumb shit this organization has done, sitting Caufield for the playoffs might be the dumbest of all. And we've seen the org do plenty of dumb shit lol. I wont believe it til I see it, it's just too dumb to not play him
two of his goals were on 3-3 which you wont see in the playoffs.4 goals in 10 games. On pace for over 20 in 56 games. Only Toffoli and Gallagher have scored at that pace.
But let's leave him in the stands. We need the extra player that's good defensively but can't do shit in the offensive zone.
two of his goals were on 3-3 which you wont see in the playoffs.
his other two goals? One was a late game PP in a game that the Leafs were up 5-0 and the other in a exhibition game against the Oilers.
I like the kid but watching him in his D zone I understand the decision.
That being said the experience would be great for him and with the crap team we have I want to see it.
I would probably take playoff Lehkonen over playoff Tatar alsoArmia plays a heavy playoff style game - I'd take him over Tatar.
two of his goals were on 3-3 which you wont see in the playoffs.
his other two goals? One was a late game PP in a game that the Leafs were up 5-0 and the other in a exhibition game against the Oilers.
I like the kid but watching him in his D zone I understand the decision.
That being said the experience would be great for him and with the crap team we have I want to see it.
I assume it will be announced after the pregame warm up next Thursday.Has the decision been announced?
you take away 3 on 3 goals and habs dont play the leafs, as they would be 2nd or 3rd in divisiontwo of his goals were on 3-3 which you wont see in the playoffs.
his other two goals? One was a late game PP in a game that the Leafs were up 5-0 and the other in a exhibition game against the Oilers.
I like the kid but watching him in his D zone I understand the decision.
That being said the experience would be great for him and with the crap team we have I want to see it.
has nothing to do with fact they dont play 3 on 3 in the playoffsyou take away 3 on 3 goals and habs dont play the leafs, as they would be 2nd or 3rd in division
All true except they dont play three on three in the playoffs. Cole is the type of little flashy player who thrives in 3 on 3. All credit to him.I wished other players would score those useless goals...
A goal is a goal. Let's take away 3-on-3 goals for McDavid and Matthews or anyone else.
The sample size is too small, but discrediting goals is not a way to look at it. How many goals do other Habs players have? They're all playing the same game in the same team. Someone's got to score.