Sens of Anarchy
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2013
- 65,700
- 50,498
I hope they show him the video of the giveaway to the player with no stick
"These two clubs came real close to making a pretty big trade not that long ago and just couldn’t get it done, and that trade was Taylor Hall for, I think they finally got to a place where Ottawa was willing to consider Cody Ceci, so it would have been Hall for Ceci, but it had to be cleared in Ottawa through ownership and before they could get clearance Hall got traded to New Jersey for Larsson," said Dreger as per the Edmonton Journal.
Don't ya just love this man
Seriously if Dorion had a pair this would have been done
This will always make me le sad
Don't ya just love this man
Seriously if Dorion had a pair this would have been done
I wonder if Dorion is doing a character assassination on Ceci during this hearing.
More like if we didn’t have Melnyk it would have been done.
We would take him to Arb ,to save 100k ...The problem with Taylor Hall is eventually he'd want to get paid what he's worth. And we don't stand for that **** here- we'd be shipping him out
10 bucks? Isn't that what the team offered Ceci?I would pay $10 to see this arbitration hearing.
10 bucks? Isn't that what the team offered Ceci?
Hey, you’re not the wallet inspector.
So Ceci made 3.35 last year, and that’s what Ottawa is offering now. Has the team soured on him? Part of it has to do with trying to keep his salary down, but how often does a team offer the same salary amount in arbitration? My guess is they don’t like Ceci as much as they did a year ago or two years ago.
This will always make me le sad
I feel the same way with the organizations feelings about Ceci. I don't think it will happen but if the Senators decide on a 2 year term it will be very telling.
I was thinking a two year term could be team beneficial. It depends on what everyone thinks will happen with Karlsson. If he is traded, especially sooner rather than later, that likely would result in increased stats for Ceci and an increased role. Two years salary based on last year may be a better deal than two one year salaries if he has a better statistical year this year due to Karlsson leaving.
I'd argue if the team wants two, one reason may likely be that they consider losing Karlsson a forgone conclusion.
I don't get why each side needs to hear what the other says about them in these arbitration hearings...seems to me all that does is create hurt feelings/bad blood between the team and its player. Why not just have the GM and the player agent plead their cases separately to the arbitrator and wait for his/her decision?
I don't get why each side needs to hear what the other says about them in these arbitration hearings...seems to me all that does is create hurt feelings/bad blood between the team and its player. Why not just have the GM and the player agent plead their cases separately to the arbitrator and wait for his/her decision?