It’s awesome and I love it. This is why fans are clueless. All the factors cited are valid reasons. They aren’t excuses. They are valid reasons that have a massive impact on the team. Fans will never understand cause they are too emotionally invested. Too much going on to determine win loss record.
I think your criticism is fair. However, here is my criticism of this coaching staff:
1. Does not field optimal rosters. Does not use bottom six spots to develop young players. Instead relies on low upside veterans, which leads to depth scoring issues.
2. Offensive system priortizes shots from the point instead of maining puck possesion to eventually create a shot of a royal road pass.
3. Team goes through stretches where they can't manage the puck, puck is not moved quickly enough.
4. Gap control through Neutral Zone is poor, which allowes easy zone entries.
5. Defensive system appears to be predicated on gaining puck possesion as quickly as possible, as a result defensemen leave the front of the net too quickly, resulting in high danger chances against.
6. Breakouts and forechecking appear to be one-dimensional, easy for the opposition to adjust for.
7. Power Play units only have a couple of options shot from point, cross-ice one timer. Does not appear to emphasize puck movement to expliot seams in opposition PK e.g. Washington Capitals or Tampa Bay powerplay.
8. Penalty kill appears to emphasize taking away point shot from center blue line, which opens up cross-ice seam pass.
I believe the jekyll and hyde nature of this team is because of the above reasons. Winning purely based on roster talent is not sustainable unless you are the late 80s Oilers, early 80s Islanders, or 70s Canadiens, and even those teams had good coaching.
I would not call for Boughner to be fired without a clear upgrade avaiable (Quenville). Firing a coach just for the sake of it and replacing him with another average coach is a bad idea, but when there is a clear upgrade available with Cup winning pedigree, it has to be done.