redbull
Boss
- Mar 24, 2008
- 12,593
- 654
At the game last night, first one this year, and have to disagree with the reviews on Clutterbuck.
Fist off this team doesn't need this type player, they have one his name is Matt Martin and he has more talent than Clutterbuck.
Yes, Clutterbuck was throwing himself all over the place but did so very recklessly. Three times I saw was more concerned with hitting then being responsible for his man. Once, mid 2nd period, it lead directly to a Sabre scoring chance.
Has the Isles not had Martin, then the need for a Clutterbuck type guy was warranted. In this case all he's doing is using air that others could benefit from.
What you are saying is right. Cutterbuck definitely has some reckless Jordin Tootoo/Steve Webb element, running around trying to make a big hit at the expense of the safe/smart/positional play. Where I think we disagree is whether the Islanders need this type of player or not.
I think yes.
I'd take another Matt Martin in a heartbeat. Over the next Bouchard/Boyes/Parenteau/Nino for sure. I'd also take another Colin McDonald and Casey Cizikas for that matter.
The Islanders are only good when they play inspired, energetic, emotional hockey. When they do, they are pretty damn good. Tavares got into a little "thing" with Ott yesterday and played like he was on a mission after that. Guys like Clutterbuck and Martin and Cizikas HELP that. Zenon Konopka and Matt Martin, in the historic Pens 9-3 romp and subsequent winning streak, do the same.
If hockey was as simple as stick handling, passing, shooting and stats, then Rob Schremp would not be in Europe.
I loved Clutterbuck's game yesterday. You take the poor penalties and the erratic coverage, at times. Just as you would when Brendan Witt and Rich Pilon and Darius Kasparaitis and Bryan Marchment and Ulf Samulelsson would go out of their way to hit and harass players like Mario Lemieux, Cam Neely.
That's a HUGE part of the game, one that is very underrated by some.