Claude Giroux: "Reasons to be Cheerful Part III"

Status
Not open for further replies.

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
And I'll bet almost every penalty he's had the last couple years has been a "reach" penalty with the stick.
For obvious reasons, he's not going to draw a lot of interference penalties.

He also gets the "star's break" on a lot of potential stick infractions.
Giroux isn't as fast and explosive as he was in his prime, few NHL players are at 30.
And he's 5'10 185, he's not going to use his butt to protect the puck like Couts. :sarcasm:

Like I said, it's subtle, not glaring, but Giroux is easier to pressure (see the 2017-18 playoffs), he coughed up the puck a couple times in his D-zone today.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
That line also had awful metrics while Couts was struggling, so maybe Giroux was a little lucky?
Scoring is stochastic, see TK, but good play is reliable (and eventually leads to scoring).

Giroux was 2-4 6 at ES the first 11 games, 3-3 6 at ES the last 5 games.
Hmmm. See a difference?
 

Young Sandwich

Trout & Hockey
Sponsor
Dec 13, 2015
5,736
19,954
Outerspace
Giroux looks better because Couts is playing better, that line was being dominated for a while as Couts struggled with the knee. Couts shows you that you can compensate to some extent for a lack of speed with strength and smarts, but Strome still has to learn to skate.

One thing I've noticed, the changes in the game have impact Giroux in subtle ways.
Over the last five or so years, the NHL has gotten faster, not so much the top end but the disappearance of slugs, so that everyone is now a decent skater. This has reduced the margin for error.

Moving to LW has protected Giroux, but he seems to have more "reaching" stick penalties and gets pressured into turnovers more than he used to a few years ago, less clean ice available these days. He's been able to adjust at LW b/c he doesn't skate 200 feet and can lay back and let TK chase the puck and Provorov/Ghost bring it up. His role is more of a play maker than a play driver these days.
cool-story-bro-5.jpg
 

bauer

I MISS GHOST
Nov 11, 2007
4,599
4,766
wait, the guy who is third in the league in scoring... Are we complaining about him?

it's the same one person. he's a contrarian and needs to fight people on every little thing. he gets mad when people rag on the coach, yet he constantly rips on Giroux, who is without question one of the best Flyers ever. it makes no sense.

i mean seriously, why would any true Flyers fan rag on Giroux? he's amazing. one of the best to ever wear orange and black. you have to question a person agenda and state of mind when they're constantly trying to make up reasons for Giroux not being an elite superstar. which he is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AdamParrot

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
Giroux is a top scorer, but he's not the same all around player he was at 22-26.
That shouldn't be controversial, but people around here are weird.

And if you didn't see how much better the first line has played since Couts got his legs back, well, go see an optometrist. They were being dominated the first ten games of the season or so.

Couts is the key player on this team right now, Patrick will be in a couple years.
Giroux is the top play maker, and TK is the straw that stirs the drink.
 

Jtown

Registered User
Oct 6, 2010
39,612
19,672
Fairfax, Virginia
28-14-11 are generating a scoring opportunity on maybe 3 of every 5 shifts together right now. They’re terrific.

they are starting to gel. Sometimes g and tk get a bit too cute and unselfish. Sometimes on a 2 on 1 the best play is a shot on goal and a rebound.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JXC

StoneHands

Registered User
Feb 26, 2013
6,608
3,674
Moving to LW has protected Giroux, but he seems to have more "reaching" stick penalties and gets pressured into turnovers more than he used to a few years ago, less clean ice available these days.

And I'll bet almost every penalty he's had the last couple years has been a "reach" penalty with the stick.
For obvious reasons, he's not going to draw a lot of interference penalties.
That's like being surprised that Giroux scores more goals with his wrist shot than anything else. Yeah so does 90% of the league.

Giroux having more stick infraction penalties is pretty obvious and it's also true for about 90% of forwards in the NHL. It's not surprising considering the most common penalties among forwards are in order, Tripping, Slashing, Roughing, Hooking, High Sticking, Holding, Interference, Crosscheck, Holding the Stick, and then Goaltender interference. 4 of the 5 most common penalties are stick infractions so Giroux having a 9 to 5 ratio is stick infractions to non-stick infractions is not the least bit surprising and has nothing to do with his speed or skating. As far as "reaching" penalties, the only ones I would really consider to fit into that catagory are Hooking and Tripping which only 4 of his 14 penalties have been. Slashing can go either way. Sometimes it's a reach and other times it's not at all.

Among the leaders in Hooking penalties last season were Radulov and Kane. Malkin, Larkin, and Trocheck for tripping. Kuznetsov, Kessel, and Marchand for Slashing. None of those guys are slow. It's actually the slower guys that are typically called for Roughing and Crosschecking.

Giroux has 14 Minor penalties since being moved to the wing.
3 Hooks
1 Trip
5 Slashing
1 Crosscheck
1 Holding The Stick
2 Roughing
1 Interference
 

Appleyard

Registered User
Mar 5, 2010
31,782
41,219
Copenhagen
twitter.com
I think he's currently on pace for 106 points or so, but it is still really early yet. Another 100 point season would be nuts though, and really starts to cement his HOF status as long as he doesn't collapse on the back 9.

I mean, his peak/prime is HHoF worthy for sure after last year.

He has done arguably more as an individual player at the same age relative to his era than guys like Sundin and Modano.

I think had he not played ~7 years of his prime (2010-17) in the lowest scoring era since the ~1950's he would already have a spot secured.


I mean, it would not actually be crazy for him to lead the entire NHL in scoring over the 10's decade.

Only one more season of it after this and he is currently:

2pts behind Crosby, who has not had a 90+ point season since 13-14.
6pts ahead of Kane, who is less than a year younger than him and is on a declining team.
14pts ahead of Ovechkin, who is 2.5 years older and has not hit 90+ points since 09-10.
39pts ahead of Tavares...

barring injury he could do it, even though I would not put him as odds on favourite, but after this year who knows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beef Invictus

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
Can't really compare with Ovechkin, who's a goal scorer, not a points aggregator (scoring goals at the rate he does makes him exceptional).

I'd take Giroux over Kane and Tavares.
I'd take Crosby over Giroux.

Giroux can be a great player (careerwise) yet not be the same player he was at his peak in his early to mid-20s.
Being a top player for a decade or more is an accomplishment which doesn't require exaggeration to be appreciated.

My point on Couts is that moving to LW with Couts has extended Giroux's productive years by taking a lot off his plate, less skating, not having to wrestle with opposing centers, fewer defensive responsibilities.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad