MikeSteaks
Registered User
- Sep 30, 2017
- 493
- 804
I find their transparency quite refreshing.Openly rebuilding is defeating the purpose of competitiveness. If you Rebuild, don't announce it and let your players know full well what's going on.
I find their transparency quite refreshing.Openly rebuilding is defeating the purpose of competitiveness. If you Rebuild, don't announce it and let your players know full well what's going on.
would Sprong + Hunwick + 2nd rd pick???
Overpayment? Underpayment?
Gonna have to be a no doubt overpay for us to put him on Crosbys wing.
A deal you won't agree to
No it wouldn't lol you are naiveBenching Lunq will have the NHL sticking their noses around.
would Sprong + Hunwick + 2nd rd pick???
Overpayment? Underpayment?
It would have to be almost unrealistic for us to move Kreider or Miller to the PensOk what would you want coming back, be realistic though.
Always been a huge fan of his, would be perfect in the Penguins system.
Yet they both lost the lottery to the oilers... #Rigged or #anti-tank or luckYou obviously were not watching when Buffalo traded any goalie that tried to win a game the year they were going for McDavid. NHL did not care a lick, and Arizona was trying just as hard to lose every game that year, it was the most obvious front office sabotage job I have seen in recent years.
Sprong + 1st + a 2nd is more like it. We don't want Hunwick. It is in the Metro, I am not even sure they would make the trade.
Better keep playing him, even though he's pretty much burned out right now! After all he's on pace for 68 GS anyway! f*** him. Wan't let the NHL in on our tanking scheme. GM Jim Gorton already announced a tank anyway! Kill Henrik!Benching Lunq will have the NHL sticking their noses around.
I don't see Hunwick getting a second, more like a fourth, so no. Honestly, in the Ducks offer we were asking for 2 former first rounders and their next 1st. That is the kind of overpayment it would take. I was actually being nice making it a 2nd instead of two 1sts. He is part of the young core that I don't think they want to move, it would cost someone a whole lot to get him, even more for someone in the Metro. Best not to ask I guess....I would do Sprong + 1st, but instead of 2nd, we'd have to shed salary, so Sprong + 1st + Hunwick, then the rangers flip Hunwick for a 2nd/3rd round pick to somewhere??
I think he's suggesting that it's strange a team just 3 points out of a playoff spot, with ~30 games to go, is publicly announcing "screw it, we're rebuilding." I don't expect the Rangers to make it in regardless of what they do, but the Rangers' management is, for all intents and purposes, announcing that they are sort of tanking for the rest of the year and that they don't even want to be in the playoffs. You don't publicly announce the beginning of a rebuild if you want to win. It's frankly a really weird thing to announce in the midst of a season, when the team is still sort of middle of the pack. It's the sort of announcement you either never expect, or expect at the end of a season when the team has naturally had a really poor finish.
Bergevin I know you see this, pls dont.
How about Miller instead?
i don't blame you he's been a 50 point guy but man sometimes you just want to throw something at the tvIf I'm trading a dman for a winger he's gotta have more cache than JT Miller
Ok what would you want coming back, be realistic though.
Always been a huge fan of his, he's tailor made for the Penguins system.
I admire their rebuild intentions but what they are doing is certainly anti-competitive, destroying the integrity of the game, especially with informal announcements of one.