Cheddabombs
Status Quo
- Mar 13, 2012
- 24,747
- 31,600
Castron stepping up to the podium with a 67's player available
I disagree. Palms and Gusev only have 2 years before UFA, and everyone else look to be bottom 6ers. Just looking at the younger players, I think RW is actually our weakest depth. We have guys that are prospective top 6 at LW in Bratt and Boqvist, and our two young centers. On D we have Smith on the left and Walsh on the right, along with Severson who's still relatively young.Organizational RW depth has suddenly become a major strength in a short period of time
There’s a good chance the organization can fill RW3 and RW4 internally with all of their options. We’ll see what happens with Palmieri and Gusev longterm and maybe the Devils draft a potential top line RW in June. There are still a lot of questions and we don’t have Marner/Nylander/Kapanen type of depth waiting to come up, but it seems the team is in a much better spot now with Palmieri, Gusev, Thompson, Anderson, Merkley, Clarke, and Moynihan....maybe Bastian.
RW seems to have joined the other positions (besides RHD) where there’s a good chance of building most of the team, we just don’t have those top talents.
If NJ could come out of the first round this year with two top defenders and a top RW it would help.
Forgot about Tyce Thompson too.I disagree. Palms and Gusev only have 2 years before UFA, and everyone else look to be bottom 6ers. Just looking at the younger players, I think RW is actually our weakest depth. We have guys that are prospective top 6 at LW in Bratt and Boqvist, and our two young centers. On D we have Smith on the left and Walsh on the right, along with Severson who's still relatively young.
Clarke has a shot but I'm not 100% convinced yet. Give him a healthy year and I'll consider it. Bastian and Anderson look to be bottom 6, and Zetterlund hasn't impressed in Bing.
-edit-
Ok, I thought about this more. I suppose we DO have depth. Just not quality depth. RHD may be just bad. Either way, I'm not sure I consider RW a strength.
Ah. I thought he was a center.Forgot about Tyce Thompson too.
He plays center at Providence I believe but he's projected as pro RW.Ah. I thought he was a center.
As of now I think Anderson and Thompson (I’m buying in to @StevenToddIves pumping his tires) are our best bets to lock down the bottom two RW spots. Draft a top line RW and then we’d only need to worry about RW2 if Palmieri isn’t around.
Noel Gunler, top ten talent who has a chip on his shoulder (on and off the ice). I can see him sliding to one of the Devils late firsts.
Noel Gunler | Noel Gunler Profile | Noel Gunler Scouting Report 2020
Hoelscher is an exciting prospect even if his production falls at the NHL level. 60% faceoff rate and pk points are fun to see.
I think it's a good idea to be risky with that VAN pick and try to maximize value. If there's a guy that's falling because he doesn't like playing defense or has maturity issues or had a major injury, whatever. I'm fine taking a project/developmental pick there IF they have the talent.
But with a likely top-5 pick and a likely top-12 pick - you can't f*** around with those two picks. Trust your scouting department to take the BPA. Once you get in the 20's you can get creative.
I wonder if the Devils consider Askarov with one of their firsts. Ottawa may beat the Devils to it, but our only real needs in the prospect pool at the moment are top end defensive prospects. The forward core (Hischier-Hughes-Zacha-Bratt and whoever of Boqvist, Foote, etc. who joins them) is young and should be around for quite a while.
I could see us going forward prospect, defensive prospect, and swinging at Askarov with the other pick.
Askarov won’t be there at the Vancouver pick, but you have to take him if he’s somehow there.
Why what? Why won't he be there or why should they take him? I don't think he lasts that long. I can see a few teams taking him prior to where Vancouvers pick likely winds up being.Y tho
Why what? Why won't he be there or why should they take him? I don't think he lasts that long. I can see a few teams taking him prior to where Vancouvers pick likely winds up being.
Oh I'm not advocating taking him for us at all.Why take a goalie that looks less and less like a generational talent with a 1st round pick? What if someone like Quinn or Mysak falls?
If I am going to take a gamble I take it on Jérémie Poirier, his skillset looks that of a young PK Subban.
Why take a goalie that looks less and less like a generational talent with a 1st round pick? What if someone like Quinn or Mysak falls?