Le Barron de HF
Justin make me proud
Woah, some are overblowing his skating issues. It's a weakness but he's by no means Corey Locke territory. The NHL is leaning more and more on speed but 5 years ago Hudon's skating would have been fine.
Clode also wants a 4th line exactly like the one he currently has, he has always had those types of players on his teams, I really saw nothing wrong about Hudon on the 4th line but he is also a dime dozen tweener which the pro ranks are full of. Probably thrive in the KHL or somewhere else in Europe and make a fantastic income for doing something they love but still pursuing the NHL dream.
Woah, some are overblowing his skating issues. It's a weakness but he's by no means Corey Locke territory. The NHL is leaning more and more on speed but 5 years ago Hudon's skating would have been fine.
Our 4th line is a Claude Julien version of a 4th line and I kind of think that most of the league is getting away from that, we could easily sit Deslauriers or Chaput and it wouldn't matter, it's just C Juliens style and like you said, the other 3 could probably adequately do the job.The 4th line as currently constituted, hasn't been as good with Hudon on it. Having said that the Hudon Plekanec Peca 4th line could at least rival this 4th line - I'd have to see more of each to pick a winner. It will be interesting to see what happens when Shaw comes back. I could see Hudon Chaput Shaw having more success than Agostino Chaput Shaw.
I mean right now Chaput seized the opportunity and is fairly lucky of the current make up of our roster. He's filling his role to a tee as far as to what CJ is asking of him: faceoff wins and low event hockey. He's kind of a poorman of Halpern for us in 2011. I don't ser him still being a regular for us 2 years from now.Our 4th line is a Claude Julien version of a 4th line and I kind of think that most of the league is getting away from that, we could easily sit Deslauriers or Chaput and it wouldn't matter, it's just C Juliens style and like you said, the other 3 could probably adequately do the job.
Still don't see what Chaput or D'Agostino bring to warrant sitting him in favor of either of them...
Play him from now till the deadline & hope some team sees him as worth a pic or prosopect
Better that than yet another young player lost to waivers for nada
I for one, will always be amazed by the sheer numbers of "water is wet" kind of articles the Habs can generate over the years.
“Charlie wants to play in the National Hockey League, whether it’s Montreal or somewhere else,” said player agent Allain Roy
You don't say... So Hudon is not aspiring at a playing career in the AHL and is not considering retirement as a 24 years old... Shocking!
Hmmm who fits the bill here?It could have been worse. The thread could have originated from a source that is not the Athletic but someone who merely regurgitates our thread content into a piece.
Clode likes that in a 4th line, the grinders that like you say that play low event hockey. It's funny but we let go a very low event younger player in De La Rose, seems weird.I mean right now Chaput seized the opportunity and is fairly lucky of the current make up of our roster. He's filling his role to a tee as far as to what CJ is asking of him: faceoff wins and low event hockey. He's kind of a poorman of Halpern for us in 2011. I don't ser him still being a regular for us 2 years from now.
Our 4th line is a Claude Julien version of a 4th line and I kind of think that most of the league is getting away from that, we could easily sit Deslauriers or Chaput and it wouldn't matter, it's just C Juliens style and like you said, the other 3 could probably adequately do the job.
Off the top of my head, I believe CJ has never developed one of these grinders himself, they are always semi-polished products whom CJ was able to do a few tweaks here and there in order for them to play the way he wants: Paille (at least 250 games before joining Boston; 25 years old), Campbell (300 ish games; 25 years old), Thornton (70 ish games NHL level, almost 10 seasons spent in the AHL; 30). In NJ, obviously he only spent a year there but he had a 36 year old Jim Dowd (who he had in 04), a 26 year old Michael Rupp and a journeyman like Erik Rasmussen as his 4th line. It's interesting to note that in NJ his fourth line played around 6-8 minutes, so it seems he really changed his philosophy over the years. Was too young to comment on his first stint as to who he had, but he did have Begin who again had plenty of experience at the pro level.Clode likes that in a 4th line, the grinders that like you say that play low event hockey. It's funny but we let go a very low event younger player in De La Rose, seems weird.
It could have been worse. The thread could have originated from a source that is not the Athletic but someone who merely regurgitates our thread content into a piece.
Why is that there are still slow younger players with all of the advances in training and technology? Are the players not putting in the work or is physically impossible for them to get better?
So what you're actually saying is that he is slower than those faster than him which is everyone.its because in reality these players aren't slow. Skate against Hudon he will make any non pro look like a snail. This guy could probably do things on skates 99% of the population could only imagine.
The issue is that the other players are just much better and faster than him. Thats what happens when you have a league of about 700 players taking from a global pool. Only the best make it. Hudon isn't slow, its that everyone else is faster than him. When you only take the best of the best, if you aren't the best there are going to be people better than you.
there wont be any.Just not NHL quality. Very similar to Scherbak who just couldn't make the jump. Can't give in to all these player demands. Sit in the press box and wait for your opportunity.