Chabot vs. Rielly

[TheBradyBunch]

Lol. Imagine being this blinded. It’s ok to give into reality once in a while.

He leads all d-men in goals, points, PPG, leads all NON-Leafs d-men in +/-, and his team is at the top of the standings with the best goal differential.

Never mind being the front runner. He’d 100% win today, with unanimous vote!

The Patriots play in the Super Bowl.
You, my friend, dominate the hyperbole.

 

[HockeyGuruPitka]

Absolutely love what im seeing from Rielly at both ends of the ice. However when you consider their development curves, one would have to think Chabot will surpass Rielly once he is 24/25. Voted Chabot on the premise of the thread (building for future). Immediate is obviously Rielly.

 

[HarrisonFord]

Ok nostrdamous. Lol any other hot predictions you want to let us all know about?

Yeah sure. I’d take the Bears to cover the spread vs the Lions tomorrow

 

[Morbo]

...."extra"?

 

[bert]

Yeah sure. I’d take the Bears to cover the spread vs the Lions tomorrow

I was hoping for some more 2038 predictions as you seem to be really dialed into that time period.

 

[HarrisonFord]

I was hoping for some more 2038 predictions as you seem to be really dialed into that time period.

There will be problems with digital systems causing a scare similar to Y2K

 

[bert]

There will be problems with digital systems causing a scare similar to Y2K

Uhhh Harrison its quite clear that you are familiar with 2038 as thats when Melnyk will potentially be moving on from the Sens (at the earliest) as i recall you saying. I dont like these mixed messages.

 

[HarrisonFord]

Uhhh Harrison its quite clear that you are familiar with 2038 as thats when Melnyk will potentially be moving on from the Sens (at the earliest) as i recall you saying. I dont like these mixed messages.

Read up on the year 2038 problem man. It’s a real thing. The binary storage of the time in these digital systems basically gets reset to 0

 

[NyQuil]

Also, pogs will be coming back.

 

[HarrisonFord]

Also, pogs will be coming back.

I knew I held onto my collection and kept it at my parents house for 20 years for a reason!

 

[Sting]

This poll aside, I am pleasantly surprised at how well Chabot's two-way game has developed.

While he may not have the all-world hands that Karlsson has/had, he's certainly better defensively at the same age, and better on the powerplay.

The Sens PP looks like a whole different beast this year with Chabot running the show (without looking at the percentages).

 

[ReginKarlssonLehner]

Coming from you, as the guy with 3 ex Sens as his name, that’s funny

Lmao, that's all you got on me. What happened to your brutal allegations that you made against me? Nada. Keep it moving' kiddo.

 

[HarrisonFord]

Lmao, that's all you got on me. What happened to your brutal allegations that you made against me? Nada. Keep it moving' kiddo.

I was totally going to go digging to find it, but then I just continued living my life. I’ve got a full time job bro, next time I spend more than 10 minutes a week on hfboards I’ll use that time to find it. You have my word

 

[ReginKarlssonLehner]

I was totally going to go digging to find it, but then I just continued living my life. I’ve got a full time job bro, next time I spend more than 10 minutes a week on hfboards I’ll use that time to find it. You have my word

 

[IPS]

This poll aside, I am pleasantly surprised at how well Chabot's two-way game has developed.

While he may not have the all-world hands that Karlsson has/had, he's certainly better defensively at the same age, and better on the powerplay.

The Sens PP looks like a whole different beast this year with Chabot running the show (without looking at the percentages).

Where is this alleged two-way game? Chabot is utter garbage defensively at this point. He may be as good as Rielly one day in the defensive end, but he's not even as good as Dermott defensively as it stands now.

 

[jbeck5]

You know what's not extra? The dollars melynk is willing to spend, thus forever screwing your team over. Have fun.

Lol what are you talking about? This is chabot vs rielly.

Are you telling me that you're so extra that you felt hurt with he current subject matter, and changed subjects to try and insult others? That's so extra dude lol come on. Quit being so extra.

 

[Pay Carl]

I was totally going to go digging to find it, but then I just continued living my life. I’ve got a full time job bro, next time I spend more than 10 minutes a week on hfboards I’ll use that time to find it. You have my word

lmaoooo this is so lame

 

[NyQuil]

Where is this alleged two-way game? Chabot is utter garbage defensively at this point. He may be as good as Rielly one day in the defensive end, but he's not even as good as Dermott defensively as it stands now.

LOL.

Why are you comparing a bottom-pairing defenceman with a #1 defenceman?

Dermott is so utterly irrelevant to this discussion it's not funny. He's as sheltered as it gets, well pretty much as much as Rielly was until recently.

Putting up Toronto's garbage spare part against a guy whose actually producing among the top 5 defencemen in the NHL is pretty hilarious, even for you.

I might as well start comparing Tom Pyatt with Mitch Marner because he makes the latter look like a pylon on the defensive side of the game.

 

[CantLoseWithMatthews]

LOL.

Why are you comparing a bottom-pairing defenceman with a #1 defenceman?

Dermott is so utterly irrelevant to this discussion it's not funny. He's as sheltered as it gets, well pretty much as much as Rielly was until recently.

Putting up Toronto's garbage spare part against a guy whose actually producing among the top 5 defencemen in the NHL is pretty hilarious, even for you.

I might as well start comparing Tom Pyatt with Mitch Marner because he makes the latter look like a pylon on the defensive side of the game.

lol. When was this, as a rookie? also Chabot faces closer QoC to Dermott than Rielly. Pretty hilarious to call Dermott a garbage spare part too

 

[NyQuil]

lol. When was this, as a rookie? also Chabot faces closer QoC to Dermott than Rielly.

LOL.

Do you even check the stats before you spout off?

Rielly's CF% QoC: 49.95
Chabot's CF% QoC: 50.91
Dermott's CF% QOC: 48.78

As a matter of fact, Rielly faces closer QoC to Dermott than Chabot does, and is almost the same distance from Dermott as he is from Chabot.

 

[ReginKarlssonLehner]

LOL.

Do you even check the stats before you spout off?

Rielly's CF% QoC: 49.95
Chabot's CF% QoC: 50.91
Dermott's CF% QOC: 48.78

As a matter of fact, Rielly faces closer QoC to Dermott than Chabot.

No facts, bro. Easy..

 

[NyQuil]

No facts, bro. Easy..

I wish I lived in Leaf Nation where I can just say stuff off the top of my head as if it were true.

 

[CantLoseWithMatthews]

LOL.

Do you even check the stats before you spout off?

Rielly's CF% QoC: 49.95
Chabot's CF% QoC: 50.91
Dermott's CF% QOC: 48.78

As a matter of fact, Rielly faces closer QoC to Dermott than Chabot.

yeah, it's better to look at toi QoC
Rielly: 29.88
Chabot: 28.42
Dermott: 28.07

if you go by CF%, then you're basically saying Dermott is a tougher opponent than Chabot because he has a better corsi. Really the ideal thing to use is game score, but I don't have access to that

 

[NyQuil]

yeah, it's better to look at toi QoC
Rielly: 29.88
Chabot: 28.42
Dermott: 28.07

I don't think so.

If you go by ToI, you're just going by whoever the other team throws out there the most - for good or bad.

if you go by CF%, then you're basically saying Dermott is a tougher opponent than Chabot because he has a better corsi. Really the ideal thing to use is game score, but I don't have access to that

LOL, all of a sudden Corsi doesn't matter as a possession proxy.

After all the crowing about Leaf numbers.

That's rich.

 

[CantLoseWithMatthews]

I don't think so.

If you go by ToI, you're just going by whoever the other team throws out there the most - for good or bad.



LOL, all of a sudden Corsi doesn't matter as a possession proxy.

That's rich.

it's pretty easy to go by the idea that the best players play more. Yeah some coaches do weird things like Babcock plays Hyman a ton, but I think that's evened out by factoring in the decisions made by 30 other coaches. The problem with cf% is that there are tons of examples of 3rd and 4th liners and 2nd and 3rd pair defensemen who feast on weak competition and have better corsi than better players who face tougher competition. If you want to argue that opponents with highest cf% are the best, then why not admit Dermott is better than Chabot?