Melrose Munch
Registered User
- Mar 18, 2007
- 23,664
- 2,112
Not true, they target canadians with advertising all the time. Evil we are in the age of globalization, just because there's no ratings kept does not mean they are not there. WXYZ and WDIV Detroit count essex and lambton as part of metro Detroit and even mention Windsor as header on broadcasts sometimes.No, they are not targeted directly or otherwise. There are no numbers kept on how many foreigners watch Canadian television, so advertisers have no choice but to assume zero and act like nothing exists beyond the Canadian border.
I can't speak to why WUTV doesn't have a newscast, more likely it's a leftover from it's pre-Fox independent days, and doesn't want to spend the extra money actually hiring television personalities. Besides, anytime a Canadian channel simulcasts with an American channel, the Canadian channel supplants the American signal, shutting out American advertisers. Likewise, ratings are not kept on viewers of American channels, so any American advertiser looking to target Canadian viewers is just throwing his money away...
Not true, they target canadians with advertising all the time. Evil we are in the age of globalization, just because there's no ratings kept does not mean they are not there. WXYZ and WDIV Detroit count essex and lambton as part of metro Detroit and even mention Windsor as header on broadcasts sometimes.
CTV just cut from the super bowl to flashpoint 3 days ago.
I can't speak to why WUTV doesn't have a newscast, more likely it's a leftover from it's pre-Fox independent days, and doesn't want to spend the extra money actually hiring television personalities. Besides, anytime a Canadian channel simulcasts with an American channel, the Canadian channel supplants the American signal, shutting out American advertisers. Likewise, ratings are not kept on viewers of American channels, so any American advertiser looking to target Canadian viewers is just throwing his money away...
Notorious? I don't ever remember TSN pre-empting an NHL game for some other sporting event.
You also clearly don't remember the days when CBC would cut to the National before hockey games were over. Dave Hodge got fired from CBC because of that way back then, as he dared to express his disgust with the practice on-air.
Bottom line, methinks you're living in some parallel universe
It's just like American programming back in the day, CBC doesn't have the funding to keep up and they shouldn't try. As long as they can keep HNIC, it doesn't really matter... and I'm sure the NHL wouldn't allow that to die, even if it means splitting their Canadian broadcast TV contract.
Wok with Yan, best show ever!!!
As long as it's still called HNIC, I'm fine with it, though.
Maybe you should have reminded them of that policy when they pre-empted the All-Star game for curling coverage a few weeks ago.The CBC never pre-empts any of their licensed broadcasts. Nothing plays second fidle to hockey on CBC.
So I guess the rural folk who still use over the air antennas will be S O L
Maybe you should have reminded them of that policy when they pre-empted the All-Star game for curling coverage a few weeks ago.
Weird... I saw the entire Allstar game. The only explaination is that the paralell universe that I exist in has a different CBC feed.
The pre game show was expected to start @ 4:00 because of the curling most of pre game show did get canned.
So how much hockey got missed?
I dont think any of the actual game.
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/feature/?fid=29181Dec. 20th 2010.
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/feature/?fid=29181
TSN had no NHL game scheduled for broadcast on Dec 20th. TSN2 did, and they joined it in progress. So one JIP on the secondary network makes them "notorious"? Strange definition you have there.
Everyone is missing the point. The CBC is a taxpayer funded operation. The purpose of the CBC isn't to beat rival broadcasters that have recently shown up.The purpose of the CBC is to show what Canadians want to see that would never survive on a private broadcasting channel.
Im not missing the point nor your points & fully agree as do many posting here J93. I dont think the CBC has any right whatsoever to be paying outlandish sums to the NHL for broadcast rights competing against private interests when that money could be used in so many other positive areas such as supporting independent film makers & producers, artists & musicians across the country. You'd best be investing in a satellite system for the cottage.
So how much hockey got missed?
CBC didn't show the NHL Awards live on all their channels and thanks to them and TSN I found out that Henrik Sedin won halfway through the broadcast on the tv. Who do I blame for that? I blame TSN.
You should be thankful. The NHL awards show is painful.