Pip
Registered User
hindsight is more than 20/20 sometimes. it should be a requirement of people posting that this proves anything about the dman ufa market that they link to their posts commenting on value at the time meyers, stralman and edler were signed.
1. handedness is definitely relevant. right handed dmen are rarer and more in demand and hence highly unlikely to slip through the ufa cracks for an entire offseason until they have to take a discount like gardiner just did. what very likely happened here is that gardiner missed the market. the cap situation of teams after they addressed higher priorities than left hand dmen with questionable defense closed off his options
2. the alternate explanation to missing the market is that gardiner's defensive issues are a bigger concern for nhl teams than people assume, which probably related to the situations and minutes they think they can play him. again, that does not in any way reflect on or prove anything about other dmen.
3. top 4 dmen are still incredibly valuable. there is no new depressed market value for top 4 dmen established by this single signing. there is an asterix. even if there were, it would be a brand new valuation nobody expected and it was not in effect when stralman and meyers were signed.
4. on edler, the canucks were backed into taking edler as a legacy who wanted to retire here coming off a great season. they couldn't not sign him and they couldn't give him a pay cut. given that scenario the issue was term and they did fine.
Sure we can throw out a bunch of excuses but there’s no point in excusing someone who consistently makes costly misjudgments. The simple answer here is that Jimbo overpaid Myers.