And the Oilers just traded a 3rd rounder for Fistric...I wanted him!
Holy **** Fistric was available? Son of a bee sting.
And the Oilers just traded a 3rd rounder for Fistric...I wanted him!
Holy **** Fistric was available? Son of a bee sting.
Holy **** Fistric was available?
Fistric is not going to sit around as a #7 or #8 and be happy. He's an NHL regular.
I would have traded a 3rd rounder for him...
Now we must deal with having Barker and Vandermeer.
I'd play him in the top 6, to be honest.
Yeah and if you're Dallas what would you rather have? An Oilers 3rd or a Vancouver 3rd? The answer is obvious. So the question is - would you trade a 2nd for Fistric?
I'd play him in the top 6, to be honest.
Then you have to deal with dumping Ballard right now.
Would be nice or at least Alberts
Every time Jim Vandermeer signs a contract, an angel punches Milan Lucic in the face.
And the Oilers just traded a 3rd rounder for Fistric...I wanted him!
We wouldn't have been able to top Edmonton's offer of 61st overall.
I think you are just enamoured by the fact that Fistric is a former first round draft pick that captained the Giants. Fistric hasn't developed very well and has regressed recently. He was the 6th defenseman on a below average blue line in Dallas.
His underlying statistics were also poor.
http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67
Fistric is basically a better version of Peckham. I wouldn't piss away a third round pick on that.For Edmonton though Fistric is much better than Peckham.
Fistric is basically a better version of Peckham. I wouldn't piss away a third round pick on that.