Just A Bit Outside
Playoffs??!
- Mar 6, 2010
- 16,813
- 15,941
I 100% believe this will come to fruition.
Essentially a better speaking DimJim.
There will 100% be more rough times. Almost the entire roster returns next year. The whole crap blueline (all of them) does.
~$12m for 8 roster spots with motte heading to ufa and Boeser needing a $7.5m QO.
It’s going to be rough for a couple more years yet.
Argh...it was a good 12 hours of celebrating.
Please stay far, far away from Bergevin.
Can't wait till HF Canucks run the next GM out of town and still not blame ownership.
Prediction : Franky will announce that the new hires will have full control of everything, then by the summer, Franky can't stop himself from inserting himself into the hockey operations, and new hires quit.
Argh...it was a good 12 hours of celebrating.
Please stay far, far away from Bergevin.
Still better than JimboArgh...it was a good 12 hours of celebrating.
Please stay far, far away from Bergevin.
Really? I think a new GM will be brought in really quickly. The Canucks right now can’t afford to mess around with a important trade deadline coming up. If there is a rift in the locker room right now it’s best not to wait for that to fester any longer. Even if there isn’t, the players might not appreciate that nothing will be done to turn around the ship in the short term.Yeah. I don’t expect anything to happen quickly. It’ll likely be by end of season
I 100% believe this will come to fruition.
Essentially a better speaking DimJim.
Thing about Bergevin I like is that he was pretty proactive in moving players he feels he can get an upgrade on.
Problem is he often did not target the right players. Is that a pro-scouting issue? I don’t know. If he comes here I sure hope so. McPhee was also a mixed bag in Washington before he went on to build a dominate Vegas team from scratch. I would argue that McPhee and Bergevin share that they are proactive.
I think it all comes down to pro-scouting when a new GM comes in. Same pro-scouts, same problems.
Mostly focusing on the Sergechev, Dvorak, and Subban trade (Yes I still think that Subban trade was bad).?
Bergevin was a bad GM in most ways but what kept him afloat was his knack for winning trades that went against consensus opinion.