Well, at least, it's not another Tanev for Nylander proposal.
Well, at least, it's not another Tanev for Nylander proposal.
Tanev is better defensively
I will give you an honest response...i would like to acquire Tanev, but i would like to add him to our excisting D group; which includes Gardiner.Tanev is better defensively
Editing proposals needs to really be against the rules. Especially repeat offenders.
Why do that? Now a page of posts have no point of reference.I changed it to Tanev for Gardiner.
He has a good point.Thanks for contributing. Now go back to bed.
Why do that? Now a page of posts have no point of reference.
He has a good point.
Your reply is just meaningless personal gibe.
Pass. The Canucks need toughness more than soft skill on the wing.
Tanev for Gardiner. Two players who need a change of scenary.
Where did Kapanen needs a change of scenery come from anyway??? He has scored a few big goals in the playoffs for Toronto in the last 2 seasons.
Since when is Kapanen soft? Just because he is fast. Tanev is on IR frequently, so who's soft?
Teams that lose in the first round don't have "big goals" being scored.
What is the incentive for Vancouver to do this and why does Tanev need a change of scenery?
Double overtime game winner to tie the series isn't a big goal?
Incentive for Buds: Tanev is better defensively. Albeit hes only good for 40-50 games per year. But, the potential defensive improvement in a playoff series against TB or Boston is worth it.
Incentive for Canucks: They get a guy who isn't as injury prone. He can help the young kids.