Proposal: Canucks-Leafs

[kihei]

Well, at least, it's not another Tanev for Nylander proposal.

 

[Hockeyholic]

Well, at least, it's not another Tanev for Nylander proposal.

I changed it to Tanev for Gardiner.

 

[Allhailtheleafs]

Since when is kappy a bust. He's developing nicely

 

[Liferleafer]

I changed it to Tanev for Gardiner.

Still a polite pass.

 

[Hockeyholic]

Still a polite pass.

Tanev is better defensively

 

[oooooooooohCanada]

Tanev is better defensively

And Gardiner is better at everything else significantly.

 

[Liferleafer]

Tanev is better defensively

I will give you an honest response...i would like to acquire Tanev, but i would like to add him to our excisting D group; which includes Gardiner.

 

[Ace of Hades]

Garbage proposal. Canucks say no and f*** off. We are not downgrading our defence.

 

[Pia8988]

Editing proposals needs to really be against the rules. Especially repeat offenders.

 

[Hockeyholic]

Editing proposals needs to really be against the rules. Especially repeat offenders.

Thanks for contributing. Now go back to bed.

 

[Ciao]

I changed it to Tanev for Gardiner.

Why do that? Now a page of posts have no point of reference.

 

[Jawknee75]

Yes, I am Kyle Dubas.

Hi Kyle

 

[Ciao]

Thanks for contributing. Now go back to bed.

He has a good point.

Your reply is just meaningless personal gibe.

 

[Hockeyholic]

Why do that? Now a page of posts have no point of reference.

The original was too lopsided for Vancouver.

 

[Hockeyholic]

He has a good point.

Your reply is just meaningless personal gibe.

Bye

 

[lifelonghockeyfan]

Pass. The Canucks need toughness more than soft skill on the wing.

Since when is Kapanen soft? Just because he is fast. Tanev is on IR frequently, so who's soft?

 

[Pia8988]

You create a proposal, get replies and then get completely different replies because the two trades are not even close to being related. Nonsensical. Contributing just as much as your proposals.

 

[FerrisRox]

Tanev for Gardiner. Two players who need a change of scenary.

What is the incentive for Vancouver to do this and why does Tanev need a change of scenery?

 

[FerrisRox]

Where did Kapanen needs a change of scenery come from anyway??? He has scored a few big goals in the playoffs for Toronto in the last 2 seasons.

Teams that lose in the first round don't have "big goals" being scored.

 

[FerrisRox]

Since when is Kapanen soft? Just because he is fast. Tanev is on IR frequently, so who's soft?

What does being on the IR have to do with being soft?

 

[Devilsrock17]

Kapanen is a good player for the leafs and if they decide to trade him which I think they shouldn't, a bunch of teams would want him. And no to Tanev for Gardiner.

 

[I am I]

Teams that lose in the first round don't have "big goals" being scored.

Double overtime game winner to tie the series isn't a big goal?

 

[Hockeyholic]

What is the incentive for Vancouver to do this and why does Tanev need a change of scenery?

Incentive for Buds: Tanev is better defensively. Albeit hes only good for 40-50 games per year. But, the potential defensive improvement in a playoff series against TB or Boston is worth it.

Incentive for Canucks: They get a guy who isn't as injury prone. He can help the young kids.

 

[FerrisRox]

Double overtime game winner to tie the series isn't a big goal?

A series they lost? No, not really.

 

[FerrisRox]

Incentive for Buds: Tanev is better defensively. Albeit hes only good for 40-50 games per year. But, the potential defensive improvement in a playoff series against TB or Boston is worth it.

Incentive for Canucks: They get a guy who isn't as injury prone. He can help the young kids.

I can't imagine any coaching staff that would want Jake Gardiner to "help the young kids."