Post-Game Talk: Canucks 4, Stars 3: Hansen successfully escapes from prison, falls over
- Thread starter Zombotron
- Start date
- Status
serge2k
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2006
- 15,116
- 3
Plus they are freakin delicious.
I should fall asleep and miss all but the third more often.
Think I can switch to chicken strips?
jigsaw99
Registered User
- Dec 20, 2010
- 5,660
- 217
Canucks are 9-3-4 when I drink scotch on a game day!
The Canucks have never won a cup when I have breathed air.
serge2k
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2006
- 15,116
- 3
Normal way you get something besides regret and rep as a degenerate gambler.
Pip
Registered User
me2
Go ahead foot
Did not like it at the time because we needed a centre more than a winger last year, more of a positional thing.
I'm still on the wall overall, Hodgson's defects and strengths are both being highlighted in Buffalo with their loose offensive system. He's been on for a lot of goals for them, but for goal he's on for his team he's on for more against, that's a lot of goals against.
Kassian - he's really up and down atm. The pieces are all there, if he puts it together he has the potential to be a top 25 player in this league, if not a 3/4 line guy with decent hands and variable work rate. It's just a frustrating wait to see what he hatches into over the next couple of years.
Kassian was actually inconsistent tonight, first half he was not good, then the 2nd half an assist, a fight, and his passing looked much much better, he looked very confident, so weird.
It was like he was two different people in the game alone.
It was like he was two different people in the game alone.
Yep.
Now don't get me wrong, if you go to a casino/Vegas with friends and gamble for entertainment purposes, there's no problem with that (just give yourself a reasonable spending limit).
But if you're gambling to try and make money, you're screwed.
me2
Go ahead foot
Dallas seemed way to passive given the situation. Sit in the box and wait for a turnover from a team that didn't want to shoot. They should have tried to force the Canucks to shoot. I mean potentially giving up a goal vs never getting the puck. I know which I'd rather when down by 1 with with 2 mins to go. "Henrik Sedin won't shoot so lets guard the other 4 guys" meanwhile Henrik is just skating around looking at the clock.
y2kcanucks
Le Sex God
Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Booth-Schroeder-Raymond
Higgins-Kesler-Hansen
Volpatti-Lapierre-Kassian
?
thepuckmonster
Professional Winner.
Hansen is not a Top 6 player.
Unless we're referring to Schroeder who is a better 2C right now.
But I like Booth a lot on that line. Schroeder might be that good at making everyone else around him better.
Barney Gumble
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2007
- 22,711
- 1
Fat Tony
Fire Benning
- Nov 28, 2011
- 3,012
- 0
Pip
Registered User
No doubt in my mind Luongo starts next game, seeing as though it's a back-to-back and unless he plays bad i assume he'll get the following one as well
Angry Little Elf
My wife came back
Pip
Registered User
Probably, seems my sarcasm dectetor was way off there
I agree, at first they seemed to play a normal PK, then relalized that they had to force the issue and pressured which plays to the Sedin's strenghs, they quickly got tired after chasing the puck and just didnt have the energy to continue being aggresive.
Well higgins is not really either by that definition, and alot of people would say raymond and booth are not either. So unless we want to discuss how we need a top 6 winger (which we do) lets deal with what we have.
Hansen will help that line because its been struggling defensively and in corners getting to pucks, and passing to an open player, hansen excells at that.
What do you mean unless were referring to schroeder? I was refering to kesler, higgins, line, lets not argue over whats 2nd and whats the third line.
Lard_Lad
Registered User
Reverend Mayhem
Lowly Serf/Reluctant Cuckold
Our 2nd line is still going to be what you have listed as our 3rd line, maybe not tonight, but it will be in the future
- Status
