Well they are now missing both. So was seems like the correct tense..Was?
Well they are now missing both. So was seems like the correct tense..Was?
McBackup looked great.
I hope the Leafs backup is half as good as he is!
I don't think they did but that's just me. I like Mcbackup, he can be ugly to watch but is a "gets the job done" sort of goalie. I'd feel a lot better with him as the backup vs Sparks. Hes a great waiver pickup for Carolina as he was for the Leafs and his contract is peanuts.He is good. We all know he is. I still think the leafs made the right decision though
synonyms: | undervalue, underestimate, underappreciate, do an injustice to, sell short, play down, understate, minimize, diminish, downgrade, trivialize "for years the girls' athletic program was underrated" |
antonyms: | exaggerate |
Makes more sense to waive Darling as he won’t get claimed . Or carry 3 goalies since they have cap space
Leafs will take him back on rw entry waivers if he’s there
Same goes for Pickard even though they Have Glass now
I have this mild fear that McBackup ends up being far-and-away the winner of the starting job, but can't carry the workload so we have to still start Darling or Mrazek 50% of the time.
Makes more sense to waive Darling as he won’t get claimed . Or carry 3 goalies since they have cap space
Leafs will take him back on rw entry waivers if he’s there
Same goes for Pickard even though they Have Glass now
Ruh? Unless Andersen or Sparks gets hurt, or Sparks is really disappointing, wouldn't that put them in the same position as when they waived McElhinny and Pickard the first time? Needing to either expose Sparks to waivers or carry 3 goalies?
I also think that would be the case. But if so, isn't that still better than Darling and Mrazek getting 100% of the starts? I feel a lot better about our goaltending now than I did 1 week ago.
Apparently there's a rule where if the Leafs claim him and nobody submits a claim, they can assign him to the minors.
I believe the Leafs have done this in the past.