Go Wings
Registered User
He was in the discussion with Rasmussen when it came time to pick but lower on their board. The same tier of player though if you will.
Okay cool thanks.
He was in the discussion with Rasmussen when it came time to pick but lower on their board. The same tier of player though if you will.
Tell that to your own fans, they constantly come up with Vilardi.I mean I am tired of the Vilardi talk as a Wings fan. I wish him luck with the Kings, they are an organization that has developed heavier guys some not with the greatest feet before. I think it was an ideal landing spot for him to at least try being a center at the NHL with cover from two vets in Carter and Kopitar. But he wasn't even in the conversation when the Wings walked to the podium last year. I know that from people I trust around the team, they graded him out as a winger only not believing he could play center at the NHL level and he wasn't in the tier of players they were discussing with the pick in terms of his board placement on their 2017 board. Call them out for that sure, but it is fascinating that so many are focused on a player that had utterly no chance of being a Red Wings player unless he fell to the second round... Time will tell but they had him down their board like several other teams, they just weren't very high on him. Necas is a different story.
it looks like you missed the point entirely.Yeah exactly. Size and good skating are 2 of the aspects that get guys drafted highly and become productive in the NHL. Vilardi is considered big at 6'3 but the difference from him and your average 6 foot player is the same as the difference from Rasmussen and Vilardi.
Vilardi is a big player, Rasmussen could end up one of, if not the biggest players in the entire league once Chara and Myers are gone. Certainly a good chance of being the biggest forward in the entire league
it looks like you missed the point entirely.
Size is getting less important but surely is nice to have. Yet kinda odd to come up with size compared to a player who is big as well.
Skating is very important but Rasmussen is no speedster either.
Point is there are a truckload of other aspects that could make a player great.
it looks like you missed the point entirely.
Size is getting less important but surely is nice to have. Yet kinda odd to come up with size compared to a player who is big as well.
Skating is very important but Rasmussen is no speedster either.
Point is there are a truckload of other aspects that could make a player great.
Dude again, almost the whole draft class of 2017 is smaller than Rasmussen and a better skater than Vilardi.No I get the point, you dont think its important anymore. I do. My point is that Vilardi isnt big when compared to Rasmussen. Vilardi is considered big, Rasmussen is considered possibly the biggest forward in the NHL. You can think size isnt important anymore but it is. Size without skating is considered useless now because guys cant hook and hold to make up for it. Guys like Rasmussen who are enormous and can actually skate are at an even bigger premium in todays NHL because theres no more Derian Hatchers to move him from the front of the net.
Rasmussen finished 5th in the skating drills at the combine in his draft year which combines speed and agility testing, not sure that your assessment of his skating is correct either. His skating is miles ahead of Vilardi with 3 inches of size as well
I think youre missing the point. I dont think Vilardi is bad at all, he might end up better than Rasmussen. I'm just saying theres reasons why Rasmussen was drafted that high, ahead of Vilardi. Theyre not on some different tier of prospects from one another like some would let on. Vilardi is one of a couple guys that is always brought up when people say Rasmussen went way higher than he should've. People want to use Vilardi as an example of a better prospect, but Rasmussen produces at the same rate as him post surgery, while being bigger, a better skater and better defensively. Rasmussen is performing to his draft spot right now is all I'm sayingDude again, almost the whole draft class of 2017 is smaller than Rasmussen and a better skater than Vilardi.
Still Vilardi was good enough to get picked 11th overall.
Could it be that he is 6’3” himself and that he’s very good in so many other things, despite of his skating issues ?
If you use size against him, than according to you Ras is the next best thing because everyone is smaller than him.
I think you are missing the point. I dont think Rasmussen is bad at all, he might end up being better than anyone else. I'm just saying theres a reason why Rasmussen was drafted that high, ahead of others and that is size.I think youre missing the point. I dont think Vilardi is bad at all, he might end up better than Rasmussen. I'm just saying theres reasons why Rasmussen was drafted that high, ahead of Vilardi. Theyre not on some different tier of prospects from one another like some would let on. Vilardi is one of a couple guys that is always brought up when people say Rasmussen went way higher than he should've. People want to use Vilardi as an example of a better prospect, but Rasmussen produces at the same rate as him post surgery, while being bigger, a better skater and better defensively. Rasmussen is performing to his draft spot right now is all I'm saying
Part of the reason that Rasmussen went higher than 99% of the players drafted in the 2017 draft is that he is that big. Thats definitely part of the package thats enticing. Chara wouldnt be Chara if he wasnt 6'9.
I think you are missing the point. I dont think Rasmussen is bad at all, he might end up being better than anyone else. I'm just saying theres a reason why Rasmussen was drafted that high, ahead of others and that is size.
So using size as argument is kinda a moot point when others have size too but most importantly might have much better vision, stickhandling, agility, shooting and passing skills.
So to come back to your original post. You said you didnt understand why people think he was drafted too high, because he was bigger and a better skater...nice and well....
but apparantely people think those other available draftees were much better at everything else.
I’d add defensive responsibility and offensive IQ as other highly noteable strengths.Strengths: Size, skating, shot, net-front presence
Weaknesses: He’s not Vilardi
Too many red wing fans with massive inferiority complexes here in regards to vilardi
Strengths:A lot of talked about his size but what is it his strength and weaknesses?
A lot of talked about his size but what is it his strength and weaknesses?
His skating isn't elite for his size. Big guys like Bouwmeester, Hedman, and Wheeler blow him out of the water. It's good for his size and at best above-average compared to most NHLers.Strengths would be size, skating, hockey IQ, puck protection work ethic/leadership and his biggest strength is goal scoring touch around the net.
Weaknesses would be his agility because hes so big and his shot from outside is nothing special.
Hes more one of those really well rounded prospects where his weaknesses arent all that bad but outside of his goal scoring ability around the net none are absolutely elite either I wouldnt say. Size isnt a skill but he would be 99th percentile for size, and his skating for that size I would consider pretty elite but hes not a Larkin or McDavid either
His skating isn't elite for his size. Big guys like Bouwmeester, Hedman, and Wheeler blow him out of the water. It's good for his size and at best above-average compared to most NHLers.
Good post, I full agree, Rasmussen isn’t the sleight, speedy stickhandler that is tantalizing to the masses, but he’s got what it takes.Hey guys. I know this isn't the place for intros, but I just wanted to mention that I've been a lurker for many years, following Red Wing prospects for 10+ years and most prospects pre-selection since before the 2015 Entry Draft.
In my amateur opinion, if the 2017 Entry Draft was re-selected today, I would be happy if Detroit drafted Rasmussen as high as 5th overall. I was very unhappy with the selection at the time, but after everything I've seen of him and most other players taken last summer, I personally rate him as the 5th best player of that draft as of right now.
He had a pretty good year already.I think he’s going to surprise a lot of people next season and have a good year.
I have a feeling he will end up being another Logan Brown. Definitely doesn’t go top 10 in a re-draft.
I have a feeling he will end up being another Logan Brown. Definitely doesn’t go top 10 in a re-draft.