Buffaloed
webmaster
I'm willing to make that gamble with Hextall.Well Gandhi was assassinated so SOMEBODY hated him.
I'm willing to make that gamble with Hextall.Well Gandhi was assassinated so SOMEBODY hated him.
I understand the sentiment, but the reasoning is not rational. First you say that ownership is basically doing all the right things (paragraph 1), but that the team continues to fail despite that, the reasons for which are not clear. Then you say that the ownership is the problem (paragraph 2), with no evidence presented other than that the ownership has been constant. The Pegulas can't possibly be doing everything right and be the problem at the same time.There's something fundamentally wrong with the Sabres organization. They've thrown money at the roster. That didn't work so we tanked. They made trades for big names - and traded them away again. They a hired Stanley Cup winning coach and a GM supposedly mutually responsible for building another SC winner. They then went back to basics and brought in a player's coach and a supposed cap wizard. They've built the players a superlative dressing room and training facility. Yet, every year since Pegula took over the team, no season has met expectations (other than the tank year). It's not being overly dramatic to say that the whole enterprise has turned to ****.
So what is the common thread running through all of this? What's the root cause of the problems here? Somebody needs to do some independent cause and effect analysis which would likely demonstrate that there's a strong correlation between the Pegula's as owners and how old man Wirtz nearly ran the Chicago franchise into the ground.
Wirtz is too cheap to buy batteries for the smoke detector. Pegula is the kindly old gentleman who smokes cigars in bed. Either way it ends badly.There's something fundamentally wrong with the Sabres organization. They've thrown money at the roster. That didn't work so we tanked. They made trades for big names - and traded them away again. They a hired Stanley Cup winning coach and a GM supposedly mutually responsible for building another SC winner. They then went back to basics and brought in a player's coach and a supposed cap wizard. They've built the players a superlative dressing room and training facility. Yet, every year since Pegula took over the team, no season has met expectations (other than the tank year). It's not being overly dramatic to say that the whole enterprise has turned to ****.
So what is the common thread running through all of this? What's the root cause of the problems here? Somebody needs to do some independent cause and effect analysis which would likely demonstrate that there's a strong correlation between the Pegula's as owners and how old man Wirtz nearly ran the Chicago franchise into the ground.
I love their money. I love the financial stability that they have brought to this franchise and the region. I love their enthusiasm and commitment to the franchise and WNY. But they don't know hockey and need to stay as far away from that end of the operation as possible. They can start by hiring a top flight Director of Hockey Operations. (Even though they had one of these once.)
My cynicism suggests that they'll just screw that up too but I don't know what else to suggest. I'll just end there.
If getting Skinner isn't a mitigation I'm not sure what would rate as one.
Outside of getting a new coach what are you expecting a new GM to do? They don't have the power to appeal to the league and undo the RoR trade. If we want a new GM because we're hoping they'll conjure up a huge winning trade that isn't a good strategy either.
If we want a new GM because we believe Botts won't fire Housley than I can at least understand.
I honestly think they should both go.I was all for giving botts another year but everything he has done save Skinner trade has left a bitter taste in my mouthIt depends on who Botterill's next coaching hire is. If he sticks with Housley at the end of the season, he can follow Phil out the door.
Except Regier would have money this time and Sobotka wouldn't play on Ruffs team lolRegier and Ruff might be just what this team needs. Until they get here and Regier is too gun shy to pull the trigger and Ruff starts taking Sobotkas mistakes out on Dahlin.
He should have addressed the center position with something during the slide after the streak or when Berglund quit. A filler center to take the pressure off of Casey and Sobotka was needed and he failed to deliver.Undoubtedly, Botts effed up the O’Reilly deal and other things. That being said, this has always been a multi-year rebuild. He is doing the right things in Rochester, has had a couple good drafts and now will need to make some changes in the coaching staff and the roster.
Blockhead’s dismissal this year is counterproductive
Outside of getting a new coach what are you expecting a new GM to do? They don't have the power to appeal to the league and undo the RoR trade. If we want a new GM because we're hoping they'll conjure up a huge winning trade that isn't a good strategy either.
If we want a new GM because we believe Botts won't fire Housley than I can at least understand.
Briere and Drury were awesome acquisitions (and he had others) no argument here. He built a contender after the lockout and then sat on his hands. He added nothing of any worth to those teams. 05-06 with a blueline addition at the deadline likely wins a cup. Like I said Darcy was good at robbing other teams in deals, he wasn't good at paying market value for pieces that could help his team "win now". Is he a better GM than Botterill or Murray? Probably, but I'd also say there's a reason he's in no ones front office anymore.the same GM who traded for Briere and Drury? The same one who brought in Juneau and Warrener at the deadline?
I'm giving JB until day 1 of next year. If he doesn't do something about the dead weight on this roster over the summer and expects this same team (less Pominville) to be better via growth, I'll gladly be on the fire them both train.I'm reaching the consensus on the need to get rid of Housley, but I feel like Botterill should get at least a couple more years with a new coach. I like what he's done organizationally and in Rochester, and I want to give it time to see if the successful foundation he's built in Rochester will trickle up to the NHL.
Besides, most GMs get at least two coaching hires before they find themselves on the hot seat, which I think is fair. This organization desperately needs some front office stability for a while.
I was wanting to give him a third year to fix this but then I remember the ROR trade and fear his idea of a solution this offseason could be something like Reinhart for low end futures and garbage vet camp dumps.
I doubt he moves Reinhart.
Risto for a 1st + a cap dump or two is a move I could see him making.
I know people around here don't like Risto, but that would be another terrible return for Botterill.I doubt he moves Reinhart.
Risto for a 1st + a cap dump or two is a move I could see him making.
oh shhhh that actually gave me really bad thoughts holy, what if he didn't learn from RoR and just does it again? We would become the worst pro sports franchise ever.I was wanting to give him a third year to fix this but then I remember the ROR trade and fear his idea of a solution this offseason could be something like Reinhart for low end futures and garbage vet camp dumps.
I think Ron Hextall is the best GM without a job. Who cares if nobody likes him? Gandhi could be the Sabres GM and we'd end up hating him.
Is Darcy a re-tread at this point? I know I'm crazy, but I miss the days he was able to put a team together. Hextall would be worth taking a look at otherwise, as mentioned before. I don't hate Botterill, but his half-assed approach during the TDL and the will-he-or-won't-he with Skinner is putting me off.