Yeah I wont be really upset as long as we get in and hopefully get to beat up an NFC Least team for a playoff win. Next year get our shit together for real.
Just let Brady run the offense and take your egos out of it, Arians/Leftwich.
I mean, I have a hard time agreeing with that. Tom Brady is already 43 years old. How much time do you think he has left as an effective NFL QB? And, I understand, maybe you could argue that the "normal laws of aging" don't necessarily apply to (arguably) the best QB in the history of the league, but, on the flip side to that, I would say just take one look at Peyton Manning. He was the league MVP in 2013 and had pretty much picked up where he left off through about eleven games of 2014 (was on pace for ~5175 yards at that point). And then, beginning with the very next week, his numbers cratered. From that point forward through the rest of his career, he only had three games over 300 yards passing. 17 touchdowns, 23 interceptions. If I remember, he was dealing with some kind of quad injury in 2014 at that point, but there was no bounceback when he was, ostensibly, healthy the following year. A different arguable GOAT, and he went from being at the top of his game to being finished, almost literally overnight.
It was one thing in 2010 with a young Josh Freeman or in 2016 with a young Jameis Winston to be an "up-and-coming" team that, hopefully, would be more of a threat to make noise in the playoffs in the future but at the same time would've been just happy to make the playoffs at all in the current year. With a 43-year-old Tom Brady, I can't think that way. You don't sign someone at that age and think long term. The two things completely contradict each other. Personally, I think this team is super overrated and people just want to believe because of who the QB is and because this defense was able to force Aaron Rodgers into one of the worst games of his entire career on one random Sunday (and, guess what? If there's a re-match in the playoffs, it's gonna be at Lambeau, not Raymond James, and in cold weather, not warm Tampa), but what I think of them doesn't matter. This team was assembled to make a run at the Super Bowl beginning this season, and maybe that's why I speak with such a harsh tongue for them. Because, whether you want to criticize Brady, the defense, the O-line, Mike Evans, or the coaching staff, I don't have any reason to think they can get the job done. Aside from that Packers game, they've failed every big test they've gotten this year. And if calling yesterday a "failure" is harsh because of the final score, let me just say that yesterday was a 27-24 final score that was one Mecole Hardman-dropped 89 yard touchdown pass away from being a 3rd quarter blowout and Patrick Mahomes having a very real chance at setting a single-game passing yards record (he finished with 462, the record is 554, and the Chiefs pretty much went nowhere the rest of that drive. 462 + 89 = 551, so, either way, he was right in the neighborhood with that play). 27-24 flattered the Bucs, big time. I wasn't impressed.
Now, sure, stranger things have happened, but the Bucs won't get a top challenge the rest of the way in terms of their opponent, so there's nothing they can do that's going to change my mind. How they deal with the Falcons (x2), Vikings, and Lions isn't going to say anything about how they might deal with the Saints, Packers, Seahawks, Rams, or Cardinals in January. So, at this point, my mind is pretty much set on them.
At this point, just about the best thing BA and Byron could do is, on gameday, get the f*** out of Tom's way and just let him call the game as he sees fit. And, for the love of g-d, it won't kill you to allow a little more pre-snap motion, motion at the snap, and play action to come into the equation, either. It's 2020; quit trying to force an offensive schematic principle that's 5-10 years out-of-date by now. There's no bonus points for playing static with your receivers and backs.