Whiskey Sam
Puck Monkey
When I saw Erskine's, my first thought was, "Hell, that's nowhere near as blatant as the one Hamilton caught." And he got three games? **** the league office.
GDT: Bruins vs Leafs - 2/2/13 - Part II
- Thread starter bruinsfan1970
- Start date
When I saw Erskine's, my first thought was, "Hell, that's nowhere near as blatant as the one Hamilton caught." And he got three games? **** the league office.
Artemis
Took the red pill
I loathe putting on my tinfoil hat, but it does seem the Bruins get the short end of the stick in that regard. Maybe they don't whine enough.
The lockout was so long I forgot during the season there is a mandatory topic complaining about the Bruins posted daily.
robert terwilliger
the bart, the
watched with the wife and made her giggle continuously by reminding her which players had more goals than kessel.
Whiskey Sam
Puck Monkey
I really do think there is at least an element of "they're the tough bad guys" in the league office. It manifests itself in their cutting us less leeway on punishment and in it taking more for someone taking runs at our guys to get punished. I don't think it's a formal conspiracy but I have seen way too much slide when our guys get taken out to not at least think it colors their perception of us whether consciously or not.
11MilesPerJohan
@BeingAHumanBean
Bruins completely controlled that game from start to finish...the leaf's were lucky to eclipse the 20 shots on goal mark...not too shabby considering that this was the B's 4th game this week.
The leaf's didn't take quality shots b/c the Bs smothered them defensively.
If anyone ever writes a textbook on how to win road games in the #NHL, that game will be the subject of chapter one.
Artemis
Took the red pill
Yeah, I think you've got a point. It's not at the "it's a conspiracy!" level but there's probably some subliminal prejudice there.
TCL40
Registered User
- Jun 29, 2011
- 25,792
- 945
I think there is some bias. I still to this day believe one of the reasons Shanahan did not suspend Sestito last year was because Horton got up and tried to take care of the hit himself. I think the fact that the Bruins don't whine to the league hurts as well.
Oh and I also think injury plays a huge role even though it shouldn't IMO. Stafford's elbow was no less dangerous than Erskine's and being lucky should result in a free pass.
It's all Vigneault's fault.
In other news, Patches will be back soon, maybe next week.
Pacioretty (appendectomy) participated in the full practice Friday, the Montreal Gazette reports. Montreal head coach Michel Therrien said Pacioretty has been cleared to play and that the forward could play next week. As further evidence of Pacioretty's imminent return, the Canadiens reassigned Michael Blunden to AHL Hamilton following Friday's practice.
Whiskey Sam
Puck Monkey
KCBRUIN
Tuukka Time
's!!!
Lost Horizons
Registered User
N o o d l e s
Registered User
The Dangly One
Dangle dangle goal
- Jun 13, 2011
- 4,528
- 0
Can someone explain the Seguin none goal. Was at a bar and coulsnt hear the explaination. Thanks
The Special K
Hoss MOFO, Hoss.
it was a ******** make up call by the refs in an attempt to try to make up for the no goal call against the leafs.
Neely08
Registered User
Supposedly Marchand, enroute to getting injured crashing into the boards interfered with Reimer and the ref intended to whistle the play dead but hadn't got around to it until after the puck was in the net. It didn't make much sense.
BklyNBruiN
Registered User
Quote of the Night
“They're big and they can be bad, but that's part of the process that your team has to grow into, you have to be prepared to compete against the big teams in the league and Boston's one of them.”
-Randy Carlyle, on facing the Bruins.
“They're big and they can be bad, but that's part of the process that your team has to grow into, you have to be prepared to compete against the big teams in the league and Boston's one of them.”
-Randy Carlyle, on facing the Bruins.
Yep, you simply musn't review that. I mean, it's the right call if you consider that other crap-call, but reviewing the goal and then not allowing it because of "goalie interference" is just rubbish.
Just finished up watching the game.
The refs were atrocious. That interference on Siedenberg at the end was BS. He didn't make any contact with the leafs player, the leafs player touched him. Add to that the "slash" on Seguin and the waved off goals for who knows what reason, I really thought this was the refs' first day on the job or something.
Glad the Bruins prevailed and won despite the refs.
The refs were atrocious. That interference on Siedenberg at the end was BS. He didn't make any contact with the leafs player, the leafs player touched him. Add to that the "slash" on Seguin and the waved off goals for who knows what reason, I really thought this was the refs' first day on the job or something.
Glad the Bruins prevailed and won despite the refs.
Ad
Upcoming events
-
HC Dynamo Pardubice @ Ocelari Trinec - Pardubice leads series 3-2Wagers: 1Staked: $15.00Event closes- Updated:
-
Tappara Tampere @ Pelicans Lahti - Tappara leads series 2-1Wagers: 1Staked: $15.00Event closes- Updated:
-
Eisbaren Berlin @ Pinguins Bremerhaven - Eisbaren Berlin leads series 3-1Wagers: 1Staked: $15.00Event closes- Updated:
-
BET ON ONLY ONE HORSE Bewitch Stakes (Gr. 3) - KEENELAND RACE 8Wagers: 3Staked: $750.00Event closes- Updated:
-
