OldCraig71
Registered User
They were also very lucky against Chicago in my opinion, there are too many leaks on D and it is not a coaching issue. How can anyone argue in good faith that we can compete on a nightly basis with the likes of Schlemko, Benn, Alzner, Juulsen, Mete, Kulak and Reilly. We only really have S Weber and Jeff Petry as credible defenders as a top 4 option, Price and Niemi can steal some games but it is the exception and not the rule, NHL hockey does not work that way. You just cannot count on luck and bounces to consistently win hockey games.I've brought up our match ups before but for some reason people just get too defensive and don't want to even admit it as a possibility.
We had a very easy schedule to start the year. It didn't look like it to start the season with LA and Pittsburgh facing us, but turns out they're struggling this year. It continued through end of Oct, and then we started getting tougher teams, we went 7-8-3 over that stretch. Early dec comes around and again, easy match ups including 3 games versus OTT. When I brought this up though, it wasn't about facing those garbage teams...it was Weber's return that made everything so awesome.
Well, it definitely doesn't look like Weber's making things all pretty whenever we face tougher teams, losing to SJ-Minny-BOS...even vs Carolina, they were lucky to get that win and played pretty poorly.
Will be interesting to see how we fare off on the road with tougher games through early Jan. Let's see if match ups matter more than Weber's return.
Our PP and PK are at or near the bottom of the league, our goal differential is poor and we need to score by comittee but yet there are posters arguing the merits of a 35 year old Duncan Keith as an option to push us over the top. We need to draft some more talent and yes that means pain but so what? Who wants to keep squeaking into the playoffs without any realistic chance at winning? Not me.