I see what you want to say, but I'm can't agree with it. Senyshyn isn't in the best possible situation to produce? Fine, I can go with that. Krejci isn't in the best possible situation to produce too, he would produce much better with Pasta and Marchy, but hey, it won't happen, so he has to do the best he can with the situation he has, even if it's not perfect. In result Krejci is the 5th best Bruins in PPG. Not perfect, but solid result. Senyshyn, while not in the best situation, is tied for 16th in PPG with Providence, that's the equivalent of Carlo/Kuraly level on the Bruins. That means, no matter where he play, he play with players who produce MORE than him. In the case of Cave, it's more than 300% more. I'd like to know of a couple exemple of player who were no factors production wise on their AHL team who then became effective player on an offensive role in the NHL. If he can't produce in the AHL, he won't in the NHL. He needs to adapt and find "chemestry" with his teamate, you are not operating in a bubble, blaming the 4 guys outside your bubble, you're part of a 5 mans plan imho.
First of all, let’s not compare production and situations from players in the NHL with anyone in the AHL, especially a second-year prospect who still isn’t in a top-six role full-time.
The NHL is based on results and scoring, that’s all that matters. The coaches in the NHL are going to put their best players in the best position to increase chances of production and goals.
The AHL is and always will be a league that is primarily developmental above all else. It’s not always about points, and that’s evidently clear in Leach’s system. These players are receiving specific tasks and assignments.
Not that a defensive-minded defender and fourth-line grinder should be expected to produce much, they are in a much different situation than Senyshyn is. They are playing with NHL’ers, Zach Senyshyn isn’t. Some nights he’s playing with pure-grinders who don’t have much creativity or playmaking capability whatsoever.
I’m not really sure how these players or their production is related to Senyshyn in any way, shape or form. It’s apples to oranges, in my opinion.
You mention PPG and Colby Cave, yet Cave is having an outlier of a season in terms of production. Could he have turned the page this year and reached new heights in development? Sure. He’s playing well, and I’m not knocking him, but he’s never been the most offensively-gifted player and is more of a grinder than anything. Is it likely that he’s now an offensive-dynamo, or is this level of production sustainable? No, it’s not.
You’re asking a goal-score to adapt and gain chemistry with players who simply can’t get it done. This ISN’T the NHL, the bottom-six on teams in the AHL doesn’t have players anywhere close to that of the NHL. As well as Cave is playing, he still projects to be a bottom-six player in the NHL and has a skill set very relatable to those players.
Your mention of current PPG isn’t exactly a fair knock to use when Senyshyn’s 5-on-5 PPG last season was on-par with JFK, who received nothing but praise last year.
Forgive me for being presumptuous, but you’re clearly not a fan of the player and are looking for reasons to criticize him.
Bottom line: Senyshyn is playing well and he should be in the top-six, every night, playing on the PP next to the best players on the team.
Why isn’t he? Well, that’s something I’m not involved with and I’m sure there’s some things they’d like him to work on in the bottom-six still. I’m not sure, and while I haven’t agreed with some decisions Leach has made this year, it’s not up to me to put Senyshyn in the top-six. That’s his call and his team.
You can read stat-lines of prospects and formulate your opinion based off that, I can’t stop you. However, I’m providing visual evidence to support my claims after sifting through hours of video watching these prospects each night. Plays like this are frequent and they won’t show up on the stat sheet, and that’s not Senyshyn’s fault.