as well as the B's appear to be doing in the mid-rounds, there is no reason why they shouldn't be doing the same in the first three rounds.
It's pretty notable when a franchise has three (and potentially 4) picks in the first two rounds two consecutive years (one year removed from 6 picks in the first two rounds).
I get what you are saying. It's reminiscent of the Panthers picks in 2010 and 2011 where they had 3 firsts, 3 seconds and a high 3rd (in 2010) and then followed up with 4 more picks in the top 64, 7 in the top 91 in the 2011 draft.
Two of those 14 high picks were also top 3 picks, in Huberdeau & Gudbranson, who were ushered in straight away at the conclusion of their junior years. We didn't have such high picks last year and won't again this year. For the record, now 5 and 6 years later, outside of the two top-3 picks mentioned above, only 2 of the other 12 high picks have made a significant impact in the NHL, Bjugstad (1st rd, 19th overall) and Trocheck (3rd rd, 64th overall). The jury is still out on Howden and Petrovic, but I would argue the 5th best NHLer from Florida's two bumper crops is Joonas Donskoi, (now with San Jose), who was taken in the 4th rd in 2010.
Further, Donskoi, (still relatively unproven), is an enigma in the Panthers system, as they have only produced 2 players outside of the first 3 rounds over the past 20 years who have played even 100 games in the NHL. That's not good scouting, in my opinion.
On the other hand, over the same 20 year time frame, the Bruins have identified 13 players in the 4th-7th rounds who have gone on to play 100 or more games in the NHL, half of those who went on to impressive careers of over 400 games. By contrast, in the same time frame, the Bruins have identified in the first 3 rounds, 18 players who have played in over 100 games and 12 of them who have built careers of over 400 games. It hasn't been a big droppoff for us from rounds 1-3 to rounds 4-7.
So I'm not arguing with you at all about the value of high picks. Clearly high picks are better to have than low picks and they are generally more fruitful. I'm just saying that we have done real well with - better than most - with our mid and late picks as well, which brings a bit more confidence with our 3rd-7th rounders than those from other teams.
So once they are in our system, I'm not to worried about where we took them in the draft. I am more interested in what they do after the draft, and how they develop, regardless of when we picked them and I'm not worried about comparisons to players we didn't pick. We have a great scouting staff.