Bruinaura
Resident Cookie Monster
- Mar 29, 2014
- 46,541
- 91,165
Awww thanksAh no worries! @Bruinaura is the best, she’s one of the guys (if I’m even allowed to say that these days!)
Awww thanksAh no worries! @Bruinaura is the best, she’s one of the guys (if I’m even allowed to say that these days!)
Awww thanks
I do have to say that all I fear is that the internet will run out of cookie pictures one of these days.
Then what?
**** No!
Wow. Your takeaway was pretty much the opposite of what he said. Read again perhaps.Yes your post does sound personal but I won’t lose sleep over it. If you believe he is a better option than Bergeron, well all I can say is we are done here, I am at a loss for words.
Where though?
He shouldn't dislodge Coyle from 3rd line C.
Cassidy I don't think would use him as a 4th line C as he doesn't kill penalties. And he's not performing well on face-offs this year either.
He's played some LW this season, but the last thing the Bruins need is another middling left-shot winger.
So all I can see as a role for him is PP duty. Would he displace Debrusk on Unit 1 as the down-low left-shot forward? If not, he would go onto unit 2 likely on the right-side half-wall. But Krejci tends to be the QB of unit 2, would he work with another pass-first forward in Thornton on the PP? Not to mention that unit also contains the shot-adverse McAvoy. Geez someone has to shoot the puck.
I don't know but it looks more and more like Joe would give them some real solid options for their lineup. . .I'm having trouble with the idea of Thornton as well, mostly because I don't see how a team with 3 mid-30's centers can win anything in a league driven by young legs.
That said, I trust the people reporting this rumor so I'm trying to see how it would work. Playing devil's advocate with you for a minute...
Thornton's 46 takeaways are good for 12th in the league, and he's the only one on that list who doesn't play 18, 19 minutes a game. He's got that many takeaways playing 15 minutes a night. That suggests he's working hard off the puck and creating a TON of turnovers with his size and smarts. Those sound like qualities that would fit on the 4th line. He doesn't hit, which is a big part of that 4th line's identity, but he will fight and defend teammates. He doesn't kill penalties either, but Bergeron-Marchand start every PK, and Kuraly-Wagner are the next pair out. Coyle and Kuhlman/Bjork could finish off the kills. They've both got time on the PK. If one of Kuraly or Wagner are out then Nordy and Lindholm come in.
I think you're right to wonder where he fits on the PP, especially if Timo Meier is part of the deal. Meier would be added to one of the units for sure, and the second unit likes to use two defensemen, so that only leaves 1 spot after Krejci and Meier. Thornton's not a net front guy. So it's hard to see how it fits with the current configuration.
I do think they could put together a good PP with Thornton and Krejci on opposite elbows, Meier in the bumper and Coyle in front. Maybe Gryz plays up top. That would be an interesting look, but high risk with only 1 D on the ice when the penalty expires.
Like when he played on two snapped knee ligaments during the playoffs? Try that sometime. Takes a bit of heart.Do. Not. Want.
This guy no-showed way too many times. Get someone with some heart.
No it shouldn't. *If* LaBanc gets moved, it's for a late first at minimum or a good prospect, not a second and a mid level prospect. That's closer to Dillons value.With some players injured and it not being about Kane, it HAS to be about Meier or Labanc. Meier would be to expensive to pay so the only possibility is Labanc. Maybe the Sharks don't want to pay him and believe last season was an anomility. Labanc could be a great buy low big win candidate. A second rounder plus a fine not great prospect should get it done
I'm having trouble with the idea of Thornton as well, mostly because I don't see how a team with 3 mid-30's centers can win anything in a league driven by young legs.
That said, I trust the people reporting this rumor so I'm trying to see how it would work. Playing devil's advocate with you for a minute...
Thornton's 46 takeaways are good for 12th in the league, and he's the only one on that list who doesn't play 18, 19 minutes a game. He's got that many takeaways playing 15 minutes a night. That suggests he's working hard off the puck and creating a TON of turnovers with his size and smarts. Those sound like qualities that would fit on the 4th line. He doesn't hit, which is a big part of that 4th line's identity, but he will fight and defend teammates. He doesn't kill penalties either, but Bergeron-Marchand start every PK, and Kuraly-Wagner are the next pair out. Coyle and Kuhlman/Bjork could finish off the kills. They've both got time on the PK. If one of Kuraly or Wagner are out then Nordy and Lindholm come in.
I think you're right to wonder where he fits on the PP, especially if Timo Meier is part of the deal. Meier would be added to one of the units for sure, and the second unit likes to use two defensemen, so that only leaves 1 spot after Krejci and Meier. Thornton's not a net front guy. So it's hard to see how it fits with the current configuration.
I do think they could put together a good PP with Thornton and Krejci on opposite elbows, Meier in the bumper and Coyle in front. Maybe Gryz plays up top. That would be an interesting look, but high risk with only 1 D on the ice when the penalty expires.
Joe is the same age (born the same year) as my daughter. She looks much younger than 40. Joe should shave that beard off. He would look much younger.Guess with Backes gone, Bruins have to meet their old fart quota.
(Yes, I realize the guy is as old as me...)
Nice well done post. Thank s!I'm having trouble with the idea of Thornton as well, mostly because I don't see how a team with 3 mid-30's centers can win anything in a league driven by young legs.
That said, I trust the people reporting this rumor so I'm trying to see how it would work. Playing devil's advocate with you for a minute...
Thornton's 46 takeaways are good for 12th in the league, and he's the only one on that list who doesn't play 18, 19 minutes a game. He's got that many takeaways playing 15 minutes a night. That suggests he's working hard off the puck and creating a TON of turnovers with his size and smarts. Those sound like qualities that would fit on the 4th line. He doesn't hit, which is a big part of that 4th line's identity, but he will fight and defend teammates. He doesn't kill penalties either, but Bergeron-Marchand start every PK, and Kuraly-Wagner are the next pair out. Coyle and Kuhlman/Bjork could finish off the kills. They've both got time on the PK. If one of Kuraly or Wagner are out then Nordy and Lindholm come in.
I think you're right to wonder where he fits on the PP, especially if Timo Meier is part of the deal. Meier would be added to one of the units for sure, and the second unit likes to use two defensemen, so that only leaves 1 spot after Krejci and Meier. Thornton's not a net front guy. So it's hard to see how it fits with the current configuration.
I do think they could put together a good PP with Thornton and Krejci on opposite elbows, Meier in the bumper and Coyle in front. Maybe Gryz plays up top. That would be an interesting look, but high risk with only 1 D on the ice when the penalty expires.
Like when he played on two snapped knee ligaments during the playoffs? Try that sometime. Takes a bit of heart.
Margarita? Cut the middle man and go directly to the tequila.****, I’m going to need another margarita to get through this
He did nothing.
The guy who went 0-0-0 in seven games against the Habs and took a stupid penalty as Game 7 was winding down deserves nothing.
He can end his career as the loser that he is.
He did nothing.
The guy who went 0-0-0 in seven games against the Habs and took a stupid penalty as Game 7 was winding down deserves nothing.
He can end his career as the loser that he is.
That was 16-17 years ago. You sound like a bitter ex girlfriend complaining about something from that long ago, ffs.
Also, his career playoff numbers in SJ are 144 games played and 115 points for a .80 PPG average, which directly flies in the face of your post. To help put this in perspective, since your narrative is patently false, David Krejci frequently gets praised here for elevating his game in the playoffs, and his career post season numbers are 132 games played, 103 points for a .78 PPG average.
So uh, yeah. Maybe you're simply blinded by something other than the truth here...