GloryDaze4877
Barely Irrelevant
Did Seguin say that? I don't believe so, in fact I believe it was just the opposite. Regarding what us fans saw, Seguin always said the right things. There was never an instance where the coach said he wasn't working hard enough off the ice to my knowledge, in fact just the opposite:
http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/07/11/julien-had-no-issues-with-seguin/
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2013/06/19/bruins-seguin-turned-to-claude-julien-for-help-during-slump/
Doesn't sound like a Kid who wouldn't put in the work, and it's rather ridiculous there was such a campaign after he left to paint him as one who did. The kid attended one of the most rigorous difficult offseason training camps out there each summer for cripes sake...
Regardless, the premise that Kane's off ice issue would have been treated differently here then guys like Kessel and Seguin's is a leap imo. Both Kessel and Seguin were key players for this team and top producers at a very young age when they were moved, and this on a team players seem to have a harder time matching totals they achieve elsewhere. Couple that with the fact that Kanes off ice issues were far worse, and that he's one of those skill players who play more to the perimeter then in high traffic areas and the argument for Boston likely moving him as they did Kessel, Thornton and Seguin seems far more likely then the alternative.
Didn't you JUST tell me that words were pretty?
Seguin's actions said way more to me than whatever soundbites he gave to the media.
You have made several references to Seguin avoiding legal trouble like teammates, and off ice incidents regarding Kane and Kessel.
I can only assume that you are referring to the Lucic "domestic dispute" in the North End two years ago that (as far as I know) ended with no charges or arrests.
Circumstances were a bit different as well. Lucic had been dating his now wife for a pretty long period and this was the only incident (off ice) I have ever heard of. In addition, he had been with the B's for four full seasons at that point, and despite the occasional hiccup, I'm pretty sure the B's were confident in his work ethic, and what he was willing to do (and where he would go) on the ice.
The other thing you look at is how the player responded. Lucic went out the next season and followed his 30 goal campaign with 26 the season after the incident occurred. Then he got married and had a kid, Hopefully, this is pointing towards his maturation as a person, which you hope makes him a more consistent player.
Kane's off ice antics are well documented, but other than a party when he was in college, I was unaware that Kessel had off ice issues (other than his supposed dislike for the gym).
Pure speculation on my part, but I think the B's feared that Seguin would never live up to his great potential and was not a great "fit" for the style of play they employ and that with his off ice lifestyle, more problems were inevitable. They decided to cut him loose before it became more of an issue and his trade value was further tarnished. We will not know for some time if they were right or wrong in giving up on Seguin too early.
If you want to say that the B's should have known better than drafting a player like Seguin and should have traded down and gone with another forward, or taken a guy like Fowler, that is certainly worth discussion.
As far as dealing Seguin, however it works out, I don't have an issue with it.