Player Discussion Brady Tkachuk (LW) - Part VII

Would you sign Brady Tkachuk at 8x8?


  • Total voters
    206
Status
Not open for further replies.

Dan Patrick

Registered User
Mar 11, 2020
1,987
1,976
Can he though?

Assuming 8x9 was what he would have went for on a long term contract, that's 72 million.

Let's say be he goes for a 3x6 or 3x7 bridge deal, he would need to receive 51-54 million over the next 5 year contract...or 10-11 million a year.

Do people really think Brady will be a top 10-15 player in the whole league at every position??? I don't. I don't see that elite offense to get there.

Sorry I should have clarified I don't actually think he will make more money by doing this. I dont expect him to score more than 65 points over the next three seasons, so unless he leads the team to a Stanley cup finals appearance I think that leaves him signing for around 8 mil a year anyway when it's time.

This could also all still be part of negotiations, "give me a bonus/NMC contract or give me a short contract".
 

jbeck5

Registered User
Jan 26, 2009
16,346
3,313
It depends where he signs his next deal. For example, take these two scenarios:

Signs 8x8 in Ottawa: ~$29.8M take-home pay
Plays in Ottawa for next 4 seasons at $7M/season, then signs in Vegas for 4 years at $7M/season: ~29.6M take-home pay

Tkachuk won't have to sign for a much higher AAV, he'll just need to go to a low tax city.

Tax advantages are real, and in Ottawa, we're at a severe disadvantage (especially with no bonuses).

Oh, If were assuming he's being traded to a tax free state then sure. He can make much more with a bridge...but he could just ask for that trade mid long term contract too.
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
54,192
31,396
Assuming 8x9 was what he would have went for on a long term contract, that's 72 million.
Why would anyone assume this? No team would ever have offered that, and nobody ever reported he was after something like that.
 

IranCondraAffair

Registered User
Mar 10, 2006
9,258
3,956
It isn't personal, its just business. He'll make more overall if he gets a bridge now and a huge contract later, it isn't necessarily about not wanting to be in Ottawa.
Let's not be naive here. He's on his way out. There is no world where he bridges in Ottawa and then stays longterm. If a top-5 pick in a small Canadian market bridges, they're pretty much gone.

Such is life, at least we know and can plan accordingly.

We need a team that wants to be here, not one with a foot out the door.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OttawaSenators11

DaveMatthew

Bring in Peter
Apr 13, 2005
14,507
13,180
Ott
Oh, If were assuming he's being traded to a tax free state then sure. He can make much more with a bridge...but he could just ask for that trade mid long term contract too.

Ottawa doesn't have to accomodate a trade. Much easier for him to play it out for 4 years and become a UFA. Maybe we'll trade him after year 3 to a pit stop for one season before he gets to choose his destination.

If we want him to stay long-term, we have to make it worth his while, or at least mitigate the disadvantages of playing here. That's either: overpaying on AAV, or giving him a favorable structure with heavy bonuses.

It doesn't seem like we're willing to do either, which is fine, but we'll need to be comfortable with the fact that he's not going to be here past age 25-26.

In short - it looks like we'll have a 3 year window with Tkachuk. "Win" mode starts now.
 

Do Make Say Think

& Yet & Yet
Jun 26, 2007
51,211
9,966
Let's not be naive here. He's on his way out. There is no world where he bridges in Ottawa and then stays longterm. If a top-5 pick in a small Canadian market bridges, they're pretty much gone.

Such is life, at least we know and can plan accordingly.

We need a team that wants to be here, not one with a foot out the door.

Maybe. If he wants out now, the best thing to do is to sign him now and get better and make him want to stay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flamingo

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
36,357
22,402
Visit site
Just as @BondraTime has been predicting would happen, which is sad. I am starting to think that we have been played by the Tkachuk camp to think that they were ever going to accept a long-term deal. It is starting to look more and more like a short-term deal was always their goal, but wanted to save it until the end to make it look like mutual resolution to get Brady back on the team a.s.a.p.
I feel like this has always been the plan. The sens offered 8 x 8 almost a month ago. Shouldn't take that long to hash out the particulars. I'd sign him to a 1 or 2 year deal max then go from there. Nothing in the 3 to 5 year range.
 

BondraTime

Registered User
Nov 20, 2005
28,794
23,578
East Coast
It's amazing how quickly some of y'all will take the pitchforks out over a player doing what's best for them, but not keep that same energy when it comes time to hold the owner and management accountable.
Don't think either side is at fault here.

Tkachuk wants what is best for him, don't blame him whatsoever for that. We all know that lies in UFA. Whatever he and his group think is best for him, do it.

Sens have done dick all to make the team better in the short run, but to be fair all of their contracts will be coming from within over the next 2/3 years. If Tkachuk doesn't want to buy in long term, (which is far from a certainty) nothing management does will matter regardless what they do.

Brady has friends here, this is his team, and he's being offered what is likely a big overpay. If he doesn't take that, which he's under no obligation to do, he is playing for UFA, as that is some great advantages Ottawa is giving him.
 

jbeck5

Registered User
Jan 26, 2009
16,346
3,313
It almost assuredly will be rising by even more in 3 years.

Yeah, it pretty much always rises. Nothing new..only covid halted that for a season and a half, and it's already rising again. That's why it doesn't really matter whether it's a 3 or 8 year deal, it will keep rising all of those years.
 

IranCondraAffair

Registered User
Mar 10, 2006
9,258
3,956
Maybe. If he wants out now the best thing to do is to sign him now and get better and make him want to stay.
Nope, you move him. Getting better and convincing him to stay is just setting yourself up for disappointment. I like Brady as much as the next guy, but if he's not willing to be here longterm so be it (I'll add the caveat that if Ottawa was lowballing him, I would blame management), but by all accounts they were being pretty fair.
 

jbeck5

Registered User
Jan 26, 2009
16,346
3,313
Ottawa doesn't have to accomodate a trade. Much easier for him to play it out for 4 years and become a UFA. Maybe we'll trade him after year 3 to a pit stop for one season before he gets to choose his destination.

If we want him to stay long-term, we have to make it worth his while, or at least mitigate the disadvantages of playing here. That's either: overpaying on AAV, or giving him a favorable structure with heavy bonuses.

It doesn't seem like we're willing to do either, which is fine, but we'll need to be comfortable with the fact that he's not going to be here past age 25-26.

In short - it looks like we'll have a 3 year window with Tkachuk. "Win" mode starts now.

Statistically we'll have him during his best seasons and if he wants out in his late 20s, he can go to the highest bidder and we'll be thankful we don't have his bloated contract like Karlsson.

That's an ok scenario too. Try to win a cup in the next 4 years while all these guys will be in their prime.
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
36,357
22,402
Visit site
Not gonna lie I ain't going to enjoy Sens hockey much if Brady signs only long enough to fulfill his duties and GTFO as soon as possible. Another Dorion fail.
Don't you kinda feel like this is the fallout from the mismanagement, instability and losing culture. Which ultimately is on ownership. You reap what you sow, everything comes at a cost the sens are seeing it now.

I think if they show they are committed to winning he may commit. But I can't really blame him at this point. Signing Norris long term would potentially inspire confidence. If I was Brady I'd be disappointed they didn't add a legit top 4 d man. I'd also be wary of where the team is headed after walking Zub to UFA.

Maybe they meet in the middle at 6 years? Sens want 8 Brady probably wants 3 or 4.
 

Daffy

Registered User
Jun 10, 2010
3,741
1,928
f*** it, if he'll only sign a bridge, trade him and whatever else to Vancouver for Pettersson, and try your luck with him.
 

Fandlauer

Registered User
Apr 23, 2013
6,715
3,903
Ottawa unless it becomes a disaster
You could kind of see it with his brother's quotes too, "Loves the city..etc.."

Just playing to the crowd while negotiating his way out.

It was over when Keith said "they absolutely need to find away to sign this guy," re: Mark Stone, and then we proceeded to ship him to Vegas, watch him sign in less time than it takes to fry an egg, and get a, maybe, second pairing D in return.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad