JD1
Registered User
- Sep 12, 2005
- 16,130
- 9,701
Dahlen for Burrows gets brought up not because of Dahlen but because we traded an asset for a piece we promptly had to buy out.
Take the asset we gave up out of the equasion and many people would still complain because Burrows was a divisive player even at his peak with lots of people hating him for his antics, and resulted in him being anchor so bad we bought him out.
We didn't really promptly buy him out. He did play 106 games for us
Anyway in my view your post here is a goal post shift. The shit storm initially was primarily all about Dahlen and how great a prospect he was and how much more we could have got for such a prime asset. What's happened over time is the shit storm has switched to Burrows himself because there's no angle to storm shit with Dahlen not having amounted to anything.