ChuckLefley
Registered User
- Jan 5, 2016
- 1,665
- 1,038
I’m trying to figure out how Bozak is a downgrade from Stastny. Looking at the numbers they seem almost even except Stastny played more minutes the last few years.
I’m trying to figure out how Bozak is a downgrade from Stastny. Looking at the numbers they seem almost even except Stastny played more minutes the last few years.
That's one thing I've been hyper-critical of. Bozak has never had a "good defense" tag labeled to him, so I'm a little skeptical of how we are going to replace Stastny on that. I'll wait to see what happens, but I'm a bit worried the penalty kill is going to be pretty bad.I agree to an extent. The one thing Stastny has on him is his defensive play. However if Bozak can form chemistry with Tarasenko, something Stastny never did he could end up being better player for us.
2. "Oh great, more 3rd liners!"
I understand this sentiment even less. There seems to be some bizarre revisionist history that Army has built this awesome collection of 3rd liners and that a 3rd line player is the last thing we need. Where does this come from?
I think Steen will be the 2LW, now that he won't have to be pushed around the lineup night after night. He will be able to cover for his mistakes, if that is the case.That's one thing I've been hyper-critical of. Bozak has never had a "good defense" tag labeled to him, so I'm a little skeptical of how we are going to replace Stastny on that. I'll wait to see what happens, but I'm a bit worried the penalty kill is going to be pretty bad.
Boom. Called it on the first page.Could be posturing, trying to look less interested on RoR ala the Bouwmeester trade.
...or not.
There goes trading for ROR
JR just said we weren’t willing to meet Sabres price for O”Reilly.
I’m on my phone so I can’t link the tweet
Nice call, did you use the force.Could be posturing, trying to look less interested on RoR ala the Bouwmeester trade.
...or not.
I wonder what the original asking price was?
I wonder what the original asking price was?
So Bozak gets the first assist of the year?Bozak has already been clutch just by signing the contract, gave Army the leverage to say he got what he needed without giving up assets.
Yes, but not without Botterill demanding the adding the 2nd Rounder, which made Army say that Buffalo would now also have to take both Sobotka and Berglund, without The Blues paying any of their salaries (which was partly necessary because The Blues had to pay ROR's bonus). Already having Bozak gave Army the leverage never consider giving up Thomas, Kyrou, Kostin, Dunn or Parayko, and to know that if he'd keep adding small extras to the package, Botterill would eventually give in.I'm going to guess they wanted Kyrou or Thomas and DA wouldn't do it but offered Thompson. Buffalo didn't want that so there was a stalemate with Buffalo eventually giving in and taking DA's ask. That's just my guess.
Yes, but not without Botterill demanding the adding the 2nd Rounder, which made Army say that Buffalo would now also have to take both Sobotka and Berglund, without The Blues paying any of their salaries (which was partly necessary because The Blues had to pay ROR's bonus). Already having Bozak gave Army the leverage never consider giving up Thomas, Kyrou, Kostin, Dunn or Parayko, and to know that if he'd keep adding small extras to the package, Botterill would eventually give in.
So, I won't ever consider Bozak's contract a burden, even if he's not worth his salary at the end. But, Army will be able to trade him off before that, anyway, if The Blues need that done.