Torontoborn
Registered User
- Jan 9, 2019
- 900
- 305
So you think Carlo is worth #6D type money? Despite being a top 4D since the day he stepped on the ice, and having some of the best shutdown numbers in the league last season?
So basically every GM is good as signing value contracts except for Dubas?
Do people not understand the impact of term?
Dubas' has the Leaf core locked up for 5 more years. Think about how much inflation can happen in that point (as a Bruins fan, you should know better than anyone the value of signing a player at the right time).
Matthews - 5yrs
Tavares - 6yrs
Marner - 6 yrs
Nylander - 5yrs
The only player Boston has signed with that kind of term is Marchand, who is 31.
Sweeney is making hay while the sunshines, and he will probably get undue criticism when in 2-3 years, he has no choice but to up his RFAs at inflated numbers post bridge.
What are the expectations for Krug's next deal?
Dubas Is paying Marner and Matthews top 10 salaries that walk them straight to free agency.
Sweeney is paying two top 4 defenseman a total of 7.75 million a year combined and still controls there rights at the end of it.
Signing an RFA to an inflated value 5 year term is literally the worst possible option. Once the cap hit finally becomes reasonable (in about 4-5 years) you've got resign a UFA in his prime. The only way a 5 year contract could be palatable is if it was a big discount. In Sweeney's case Carlo and MacAvoy clearly weren't going to sign for cheap for more than 2 and 3 years respectively.
Really hard to say... I imagine the Bruins would like to bring him around 6.5 long term and his camp is probably asking for closer to 7.5-8. The precedent is there for him to get those numbers but I can't see the Bruins being super comfortable with that.
I never like to be the one to say "he's going to take a hometown discount" but I would not be surprised to Krug take something similar to Marchand's contract - maybe 6.5x8 with a full NMC or something along those lines. I'll take the discount but I want to guarantee I will be here for as long as possible.
Marchand did his sign his contract the year before he was up so I'm hoping now that Charlie and Carlo are out of the way we will hear about Krug soon. Because if they don't resign him I imagine he will end up walking - he's one of the best offensive Dmen to have in the playoffs and the Bruins want to win now.
Points still matter for contracts.
Personally, I think Marner and Matthews will be reasonable as early as this coming season.
Comparing forwards to defence, and short terms to long terms might just be too much for us as a community to really full grasp.
That would be a great deal. I think on the open market, he's worth about 7.5 over 6 years, maybe more. I was very impressed this past season.
He's young he will learn from his mistakesSo basically every GM is good as signing value contracts except for Dubas?
They have, both Boston and St Louis the cup finalists highest paid players are just over 7M per. Spreading is the key. When you do this, you have quality all throughout your line up. Teams win with 4 lines now, 6D. Sweeney has done a good job ensuring this with the roster he has built. Buy in was key, getting key players signed to team friendly deals. The rest followed.View attachment 255167
Bruins sure have done a good job of spreading out when their big contracts expire. I would expect Coyle and Krug's to be offered 5 year deals to fit into the structure.
going on my 37th year as a Bruins season ticket holder and sit in back of net they defend two of the periods, second row on aisle- so got a decent view of their defense and watch Carlo closelyI mean..thats all he deserved on a bridge. I thought he'd get $2.35ish actually.
Yeah pretty laughable statement, lol!Ok man. I'm Brandon Carlo's biggest fan but he's averaged 8 points a season for the past two years. You think he's going to get $7m!?
McAvoy had zero leverage, it won't be that easy for Boston when his contract expires
Do people not understand the impact of term?
Dubas' has the Leaf core locked up for 5 more years. Think about how much inflation can happen in that point (as a Bruins fan, you should know better than anyone the value of signing a player at the right time).
Matthews - 5yrs
Tavares - 6yrs
Marner - 6 yrs
Nylander - 5yrs
The only player Boston has signed with that kind of term is Marchand, who is 31.
Sweeney is making hay while the sunshines, and he will probably get undue criticism when in 2-3 years, he has no choice but to up his RFAs at inflated numbers post bridge.
So basically every GM is good as signing value contracts except for Dubas?
What exactly is that based on? This is just good cap management. In a few years these guys will get big deals, it is just the way many of the teams that are good at managing their cap space do things. There is always a choice if your RFA is asking for more than you can pay, you can trade him. If their is any team in the league that will trade a guy who wants more than they can pay, it is the Bruins. With that being said, the Bruins will pay players when it is their time.
The problems happen when a team signs a few RFA's to half of the entire salary cap and then when it is time to give out contracts to the next batch of RFA's they can't do it and have to start trading people. The Leafs might not have as big of a problem with this as some other teams in my opinion just because they didn't have a group of higher priced vets that are still on the team. If they continue spending like they have it will catch up to them when the rookies they have coming in now are up for their RFA contracts though.
Canes will IMO take the Backes contract for a 1st round pick like they did with Marleau, most likely, so that Boston can either re-sign Krug or do something else. Good contract for Carlo.