BertCorbeau
F*ck cancer - RIP Fugu and Buffaloed
Which one of these is the years?
Does it matter? Either way they are bad contracts
Which one of these is the years?
Does it matter? Either way they are bad contracts
I know people are skeptical about term, but we need to do what we can to get that AAV down as much as possible.
My suggestion... 6 yrs x 5M AAV, front loaded.
Yup hopefully package Dermott and one of our young forwards for a guy to play with Rielly.
I know people are skeptical about term, but we need to do what we can to get that AAV down as much as possible.
My suggestion... 6 yrs x 5M AAV, front loaded.
My guess is 5.5x3/4 years.
I'd do 5.5 x 4 in a heartbeat.
Expansion question.
say we extend muzz. I think they would structure the deal to be unacceptable for Seattle. A poison pill like montreal tried on aho.
Full signing bonuses in the year of and after the draft. So basically if they draft him June 2021. Then they would have to pay a massive SB on July 1 and the next year. 2 big cash payouts I. 12 months is huge for an expansion team.
the only way they could take muzz then is to trade him to a team that needs help.
IF the leafs gave muzz a full NTC for the expansion year. I know Seattle could take him. But then would they have to honour the clause. Or could they flip him wherever?
I'd take that but I'd prefer 3 years. A Stralman like deal would be great.
Young forwards can play much more quickly in league. Young defense you can't give up on like that. That is crazy.All though both are quality depth players, Kap is at best a 6 to 9 forward and Dermot at best is a #4 dman. Which GM will trade a #2 Dman for a #4 dman and a 6 to 9 forward? Like they said last night on the game, if the Leafs want a guy to play with Rielly, the other team will want Sandin or Robertson, +.
At this point I'm fine with no trades at the TDL, unless we are moving out an expiring UFA contract for something that helps us down the road. GM's make so many desperate mistakes at the TDL, Dubas needs to show some stones/ maturity and not make a trade for short term gain / long term pain.
I'd take that but I'd prefer 3 years. A Stralman like deal would be great.
All though both are quality depth players, Kap is at best a 6 to 9 forward and Dermot at best is a #4 dman. Which GM will trade a #2 Dman for a #4 dman and a 6 to 9 forward? Like they said last night on the game, if the Leafs want a guy to play with Rielly, the other team will want Sandin or Robertson, +.
At this point I'm fine with no trades at the TDL, unless we are moving out an expiring UFA contract for something that helps us down the road. GM's make so many desperate mistakes at the TDL, Dubas needs to show some stones/ maturity and not make a trade for short term gain / long term pain.
Thats pretty optimistic. Hard to imagine he couldn't do a lot better than that on the open market.
The days of 7/8 year deals for guys his age might be over, but I'm sure he can do better, still.
You can clear roughly 6 mill in cap by flipping a Ceci and Johnsson, assuming Muzzin takes a deal around 5 mill.I wonder how the leafs fit in Muzzin and also add another defender with term to the back end
You can clear roughly 6 mill in cap by flipping a Ceci and Johnsson, assuming Muzzin takes a deal around 5 mill.
You could bring in a Dumba or Manson. Not with those pieces only - but that would be the cap that would have to be moved out.
There's also the possibility of retention.
He'll be 31 next summer. Age isn't on his side for a 5/6 year deal IMO when his mobility is already showing signs of slowing.
Comparables over the last few off-seasons for similar aged d-men:
Stralman (32) 3 x $5.5 AAV
Edler (33) 2 x $6 AAV
Hjalmersson (31) 2 x $5 AAV
J Johnson (31) 5 x $3.25 AAV
Green (32) 2 x $5.375
Russell (30) 4 x $4 AAV
It's rare to see a 30 d-man get long term and the dollar amount. The recent trend is higher AAV but shorter term. Sign me up for 3 years or less of Muzz.
All three will end up signing a bridge deal. Engvall & Mik because of their low games played and Dermott because of his questionable play.Its all fine and dandy for this year, yes. But next year they need to re-sign Engvall, Mikheyev, and Dermott who will all be due for pay raises.
I'd take that but I'd prefer 3 years. A Stralman like deal would be great.
Fair. It'll be interesting to see how it plays out.Its all fine and dandy for this year, yes. But next year they need to re-sign Engvall, Mikheyev, and Dermott who will all be due for pay raises.
I'd be good even with a 5x5 contract. He is clearly our best D in the d-zone (by a wide margin) and the only player on the team to put any fear into the opposition.If the term is over 3 years and the cap hit over $6m then pass for me.