tfriede2
Registered User
- Aug 8, 2010
- 4,520
- 2,984
What you mean By that? I don't understand your comment.
He probably means that Husso looks like a robot because of his stare...or it looks like he’s possessed.
What you mean By that? I don't understand your comment.
What you mean By that? I don't understand your comment.
He probably means that Husso looks like a robot because of his stare...or it looks like he’s possessed.
I cant stand "live TV". I endure it for hockey thoughIn most European countries, most television networks are government owned (like the BBC) with little or no ads to pay for content; that's where the tv tax goes. The upside is that you get to watch the programs all the way thru without a break every seven minutes to endure ads for *****es, hair implants, etc. And no political attack ads! I remember when Lehtera first came over he said one of the things that amazed him most about America was the sheer number of ads on tv.
I cant stand "live TV". I endure it for hockey though
I'd do this for football back when the Rams were in St. Louis. I'd waste less of my Sunday this way, but was still left wondering why I even bothered watching them.For a few years now, I’ve been purposely starting to watch the recording of Blues games about 45 min after the game starts. That way I can fast forward through the commercials and intermissions and be caught up to live by late in the 3rd.
I like to "live" post on here too much to do thatFor a few years now, I’ve been purposely starting to watch the recording of Blues games about 45 min after the game starts. That way I can fast forward through the commercials and intermissions and be caught up to live by late in the 3rd.
I do the exact same thing in gamecenter. Helps that I live in the mountain time zone...basically get to start the game at the "regular" time and still skip intermissions/commercials. For example, if a game starts at 7:10 in St. Louis, I can start it at 7:10 local time and already have an hours worth of junk to skip.For a few years now, I’ve been purposely starting to watch the recording of Blues games about 45 min after the game starts. That way I can fast forward through the commercials and intermissions and be caught up to live by late in the 3rd.
That’s what I do also, or even a couple hours later. Where I live it’s easy to avoid finding out the result.For a few years now, I’ve been purposely starting to watch the recording of Blues games about 45 min after the game starts. That way I can fast forward through the commercials and intermissions and be caught up to live by late in the 3rd.
That’s what I do also, or even a couple hours later. Where I live it’s easy to avoid finding out the result.
I think he’s going to surprise a lot of people in his first season in NA. Pronman seemed pretty down on his offense but reports from Europe suggest he has a big shot and both times I saw him at prospect camp he seemed more like a forward than a defender. I expect him to come closer to a left handed Parayko than topping out as an AHL player.Where Pronman ranked all Blues prospects?
nvm found it.
Interesting Mikkola wasn't that high on Pronman's list when noting how good he's.
Shut down dman wont have a high "ceiling"Where Pronman ranked all Blues prospects?
nvm found it.
Interesting Mikkola wasn't that high on Pronman's list when noting how good he's.
Yeah, but does he have a door other teams should be worried about opening?Whenever I see him I always just think "New Roman Polak". Which isn't an insult as I thought Roman was a solid 4-5 defensemen when he wore the Note.
As I posted in another thread, I really respect Pronman and I appreciate his insight and knowledge, but he is not without bias. His emphasis is mostly on offensive skill, (which explains his popularity!), but there are other ways that a player can contribute. Mikkola may not have as high a ceiling, as say, a Pronman favourite like Perunovich, but that does not mean that the "skill set" that Niko brings is not without value. Shut down defenseman still play a vital role, even in today's' NHL, as long as they have the adequate skating and puck handling skills to keep up with the play. Mikkola undoubtedly has both. His value is increased even more, IMO, because he possesses that nasty disposition that keeps opposing players on their toes, a la Chris Pronger. I am very confident that Mikkola will have a successful NHL career as a #4-6 defenseman with the Blues.
That's not a high ceiling though, especially when you factor in the increasing need for defenseman to contribute to offense. He feels like a complimentary defender.
As I posted in another thread, I really respect Pronman and I appreciate his insight and knowledge, but he is not without bias. His emphasis is mostly on offensive skill, (which explains his popularity!), but there are other ways that a player can contribute. Mikkola may not have as high a ceiling, as say, a Pronman favourite like Perunovich, but that does not mean that the "skill set" that Niko brings is not without value. Shut down defenseman still play a vital role, even in today's' NHL, as long as they have the adequate skating and puck handling skills to keep up with the play. Mikkola undoubtedly has both. His value is increased even more, IMO, because he possesses that nasty disposition that keeps opposing players on their toes, a la Chris Pronger. I am very confident that Mikkola will have a successful NHL career as a #4-6 defenseman with the Blues.
2009, in general, was a pretty rough year for Blues scouting.Brett Ponich Will he continue his career? 2009 2nd round pick #49
He looks he has gone downhill a lot.