I was watching on DVR and behind the live action. Here are my thoughts, for whatever they are worth:
1) Offsides review - Wow are some people on this board a bunch of hypocritical whiners. If the roles were reversed and we had a goal taken away for the exact same circumstances, we would have been livid. I think it was offside, but it definitely was not clear. And most importantly whether it was offside or not had nothing to do with the goal. We kept playing and we got scored on. Its been said on here several times by several people that the rule should not be used to overturn a goal based on millimeters, especially when the goal was not directly caused by the offside. It should be reserved for egregious missed calls. That is not the case here, so I am fine with them upholding the goal. If you have ever complained about the rule and then suddenly want to use it when it helps you, you are a hypocrite. Its a shitty rule that is inconsistently enforced. It needs to be fixed. However, it had ZERO effect on this game.
2) Allen - He wasn't bad, but I don't think he was that good. He made some great saves, He also scrambled and gave up rebounds a lot, but just wasn't burned by it. He absolutely has to find a way to fight through traffic if he is going to keep playing in the NHL. That's his kryptonite. He needed to save one of those first two and the third one in a critical game. They are not egregious goals but they are stoppable. Blues didn't help him near enough, but he also didn't redeem himself in my eyes.
3) Missing the playoffs - I'm not happy about it, but I'm also not that upset. We are a borderline playoff team, especially with injuries and trading Stastny. We just have too many bottom 6 guys. Armstrong might have expected some to step up, but they didn't. When Tarasenko went down, we had 3 guys that could be considered top 6, and 7 guys who could arguably be considered 4th liners on a contender. We have a few who should be AHLers as well.