Excuse me? Aside from the accomplishments he has over Jake that you've listed let's go over what else Brian Elliott has on Jake Allen and why they are not even remotely the same player. Brian Elliott has taken the Blues farther than any Blues team has gone in over 40 years by having an insane run. He broke a record of having the best save percentage for goalies that started 25 or more posting a 1.56 GAA and .940 Sv% in 38GP. Something Jake will NEVER even dream of accomplishing. Let's look at stats as a blue.
Elliott:
Regular Season
181 GP
2.03 GAA
.923 SV%
25 SO
334 GA
Playoffs
33GP
2.25 GAA
.914 Sv%* Removed 1 game from 2014 playoffs playing only 26 minutes letting in only 1 goal posting a .857 SV%
1 SO
86 GA
14 W
20 L
Allen:
Regular Season
204 GP
2.47 GAA
.913 Sv%
16 SO
467 GA
Playoffs
22 GP* Removed 1 Game where Jake only played 1 minute and didn't face a shot.
2.10 GAA
.922 SV%
0 SO
41 GA
9 W
10 L
This was all while Jake was getting his hand held until they could finally be rid of that pest Brian Elliott and give Jake the reigns that he rightfully DIDN'T earn. Now we are stuck with a guy who can barely handle a 1B situation as our #1 goalie for the next 3 years.
Obviously the part where I note that it's my opinion has absolutely eluded you. You have an opinion and I respect that but don't respond as if I'm trying to pass off my opinion as a fact. I'm not.
As for the two of them, Allen and Elliott have VERY LONG cold streaks and both suffer from similar dips and dives. What I SAID, if you want to quote me, is that between the two of them, Elliott, when hot, has a ridiculously high ceiling, as in if Elliott caught fire at the right time, he's a guy who can easily hit .930 and above. If his coaches can figure out what part of that makes him tick and get that reliably out of him, Brian Elliott would be the best netminder, hands-down, in the league.
His positioning, when he's dialed in, is absolutely second to none. But his problem, like Allen, is consistency. Elliott has not hit that one year mark that garnered him the majority of records and awards since and hey, I'm an Elliott fan all the way through, but I'm being honest when I say it might be a fluke. Right place, right people, right time, right goaltending. He hasn't repeated it since or for any other team.
Also mind that, the team he was on was a Hitchcock ran D-first team and Hitchcock is the king of running a defense team. Factor that in while you're at it and also factor that when Yeo took over, Allen's numbers took a quick dive. This tells me that both Allen and Elliott are 1B/Backup netminders who benefit greatly from a D-first system, and imo (read: IN MY OPINION), it's as simple as that.
So yes, Allen = Elliott, but given the option, I'd run Brian Elliott and I would never have gotten rid of Halak for Ryan friggin Miller. Halak + Elliott was imo the premier Blues tandem since Hall/Plante and if you let Halak or Elliott walk away, they should have been replaced by Bishop, not Allen.