plank
Registered User
Once Murphy is back, Hawks will have an extra D-man.
Rutta for Gagner with Van retaining a little.
Rutta for Gagner with Van retaining a little.
At the time, they couldn't based off who they had to sign at the time (Schmaltz, Hartman, Hino). Now they could, but do they want to? And no, Panik wasn't more important.They could have afforded panarin , Stan is just to stupid to trade the right players whom need to be moved he held onto guys longer than he should have and over paid guys. Look at Bickell and Richard panick? You mean to tell me Panick was more important to keep than panarin . Better yet let's bring back oduya, and sharp because getting the band back together this time will work.
At the time, they couldn't based off who they had to sign at the time (Schmaltz, Hartman, Hino). Now they could, but do they want to? And no, Panik wasn't more important.
Once Murphy is back, Hawks will have an extra D-man.
Rutta for Gagner with Van retaining a little.
Obviously they aren't here, but they were and Bowman was being proactive in case those players became what they could have. Schmaltz is a bottom feeder? Lol..OKAll 3 of those guys are no longer here and a knowledgeable and great GM would have not worried about keeping those bottom feeders over panarin.
Obviously they aren't here, but they were and Bowman was being proactive in case those players became what they could have. Schmaltz is a bottom feeder? Lol..OK
Thanks captain hindsight. He seems to be doing ok in Arizona. At the time, he was a budding top 6C.Schmaltz sucks , he never shot , wouldn't go into the corners , skated around and made bad decisions with the puck . Why do you think he was traded? He regressed .
Thanks captain hindsight. He seems to be doing ok in Arizona. At the time, he was a budding top 6C.
Right now? No. 2+ years ago? He was projecting to be that, and had a 50+pt season last year as our 2nd line C. We are not talking about now though, we are talking about when Panarin was traded.Whatever your smoking put it down and get yourself some help. Not sure what hawks games you watched but schmaltz is not a top 6 center or player and he has regressed period.
Right now? No. 2+ years ago? He was projecting to be that, and had a 50+pt season last year as our 2nd line C. We are not talking about now though, we are talking about when Panarin was traded.
You really are dense, aren't you?Schmaltz was in and out of the line up when panarin was here and sent back down for more training, plus his cap hit was 975000 it's a entry level contract nothing to do with affecting the cap. And his past accomplishments , don't give him a pass when he is in a contract year looking for 7 million and not performing,
Whatever your smoking put it down and get yourself some help. Not sure what hawks games you watched but schmaltz is not a top 6 center or player and he has regressed period.