Rumor: Blackhawks looking at Sam Gagner

Hawkaholic

Registered User
Dec 19, 2006
31,643
11,003
London, Ont.
They could have afforded panarin , Stan is just to stupid to trade the right players whom need to be moved he held onto guys longer than he should have and over paid guys. Look at Bickell and Richard panick? You mean to tell me Panick was more important to keep than panarin . Better yet let's bring back oduya, and sharp because getting the band back together this time will work.
At the time, they couldn't based off who they had to sign at the time (Schmaltz, Hartman, Hino). Now they could, but do they want to? And no, Panik wasn't more important.
 

Taylorst

Registered User
Jun 26, 2018
1,937
470
I predict tonight's score will be Las Vegas 7
Chicago 1

It's clear the core players refuse to play 100% for this idiot joke of a coach Stan brought in.


My prediction Stan is fire by February the latest.
 

Taylorst

Registered User
Jun 26, 2018
1,937
470
At the time, they couldn't based off who they had to sign at the time (Schmaltz, Hartman, Hino). Now they could, but do they want to? And no, Panik wasn't more important.


All 3 of those guys are no longer here and a knowledgeable and great GM would have not worried about keeping those bottom feeders over panarin.
 

Taylorst

Registered User
Jun 26, 2018
1,937
470
Once Murphy is back, Hawks will have an extra D-man.

Rutta for Gagner with Van retaining a little.


Why would Chicago trade rutta before manning ? Rutta comes off the books this year, Chicago needs cap space and acquiring gagner doesnt give them flexibility keeping manning.

I have feeling it's a bigger deal.

If rutta goes for gagner Stans ass should be fired on the spot. That's piss poor cap management and personnel management.
 

Cogburn

Pretend they're yachts.
May 28, 2010
15,080
4,477
Vancouver
We don't need more 6/7 D. We have enough with Del Zotto, Stetcher, Pouliot, Gudbranson, Biega....Rutta or Murphy aren't worth picking up for free until we clear out the crap Green insists on over playing.
 

Hawkaholic

Registered User
Dec 19, 2006
31,643
11,003
London, Ont.
All 3 of those guys are no longer here and a knowledgeable and great GM would have not worried about keeping those bottom feeders over panarin.
Obviously they aren't here, but they were and Bowman was being proactive in case those players became what they could have. Schmaltz is a bottom feeder? Lol..OK
 

Taylorst

Registered User
Jun 26, 2018
1,937
470
Obviously they aren't here, but they were and Bowman was being proactive in case those players became what they could have. Schmaltz is a bottom feeder? Lol..OK


Schmaltz sucks , he never shot , wouldn't go into the corners , skated around and made bad decisions with the puck . Why do you think he was traded? He regressed .
 

clunk

Registered User
Dec 10, 2015
11,343
5,418
I'm gonna..
just send the 5th or 6th and call it a day. don't need any players coming back unless they're just an AHL contract
 

Hawkaholic

Registered User
Dec 19, 2006
31,643
11,003
London, Ont.
Schmaltz sucks , he never shot , wouldn't go into the corners , skated around and made bad decisions with the puck . Why do you think he was traded? He regressed .
Thanks captain hindsight. He seems to be doing ok in Arizona. At the time, he was a budding top 6C.
 

Taylorst

Registered User
Jun 26, 2018
1,937
470
Thanks captain hindsight. He seems to be doing ok in Arizona. At the time, he was a budding top 6C.


Whatever your smoking put it down and get yourself some help. Not sure what hawks games you watched but schmaltz is not a top 6 center or player and he has regressed period.
 

Hawkaholic

Registered User
Dec 19, 2006
31,643
11,003
London, Ont.
Whatever your smoking put it down and get yourself some help. Not sure what hawks games you watched but schmaltz is not a top 6 center or player and he has regressed period.
Right now? No. 2+ years ago? He was projecting to be that, and had a 50+pt season last year as our 2nd line C. We are not talking about now though, we are talking about when Panarin was traded.
 

Taylorst

Registered User
Jun 26, 2018
1,937
470
Right now? No. 2+ years ago? He was projecting to be that, and had a 50+pt season last year as our 2nd line C. We are not talking about now though, we are talking about when Panarin was traded.


Schmaltz was in and out of the line up when panarin was here and sent back down for more training, plus his cap hit was 975000 it's a entry level contract nothing to do with affecting the cap. And his past accomplishments , don't give him a pass when he is in a contract year looking for 7 million and not performing,
 

Hawkaholic

Registered User
Dec 19, 2006
31,643
11,003
London, Ont.
Schmaltz was in and out of the line up when panarin was here and sent back down for more training, plus his cap hit was 975000 it's a entry level contract nothing to do with affecting the cap. And his past accomplishments , don't give him a pass when he is in a contract year looking for 7 million and not performing,
You really are dense, aren't you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ColbyChaos

ColbyChaos

Marty Snoozeman's Father
Sep 27, 2017
6,212
6,494
Will County
Whatever your smoking put it down and get yourself some help. Not sure what hawks games you watched but schmaltz is not a top 6 center or player and he has regressed period.

Why does every post you make eerily match one that I would see off Facebook?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Czechia vs Switzerland
    Czechia vs Switzerland
    Wagers: 6
    Staked: $1,214.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Sweden vs Germany
    Sweden vs Germany
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $325.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Fiorentina vs Monza
    Fiorentina vs Monza
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $20,305.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Aston Villa vs Liverpool
    Aston Villa vs Liverpool
    Wagers: 6
    Staked: $10,352.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • FC Barcelona vs Real Sociedad
    FC Barcelona vs Real Sociedad
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $1,745.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad