I’ll say what I said last November they are deep on D and have elite forward skill
I’m figuring from around November 5 to April 5 they have a top 5 record in the league
That’s 5 months
I’ll bring this back April 5 to see how I did
I’m more worried Tampa lost 7-1 to Arizona
They got serious issues. Not
Sad but true.
What we thought was an embarrassment of riches in prospects is turning out to be just an embarrassment .
Despite a 6-3-2 record there is plenty to be concerned about with this team. They have only beat non-playoff teams. As soon as the competition goes up just a notch, they falter.
Bad decisions everywhere you look. From FO, to coaching to decisions on ice. Rask has had little success against the Habs and Price his entire career. Mean while Halak has been hot, would be motivated to beat his former team . It was just to obvious to anyone but Cassidy or whoever made that stupid decision . You gotta win the Divisional games. Cant be ****ing around experimenting.
Hate to be all doom and gloom but there is little to get excited about with this team past the 1st line.
Tukka needs to go it's time. Get something for him to help forward lines. Get a capable backup for Halak also. He's not worth 7 million.
It’s OctoberAnd as the roster is currently, it will still have an early exit come playoff time.
In-season success is like kissing your sister their not built for the playoffs and will have another early exit, unless Sweeney adds some needed depth up-front.
Its been well known the Bruins need more punch up front now for the last couple of yrs and it hasn't been addressed. Sure Sweeney went after some big name FA but he struck-out as they went elsewhere. He took a chance on Backes, Beleskey, and Nash all swings and misses as well.
I like his draft ways and building through it, but when it comes to trades and signing FA his resume stinks. He needs to make an impactful move if the Bruins are to have a chance of winning the cup. Filling seats and having a winning record in the regular season, puts money in the owners pockets but I want a Cup and that should be an Original 6 franchise, ultimate goal every Year.
Please explain the first paragraph.
I’m a Rask fan, but Halak is clearly more locked in right now. Play the better goalie.
They played MTL last night without three of their Top 6 D, and still allowed only two goals (one soft). So, please excuse me if I don’t go out on the ledge.
The B’s FO and a lot of fans don’t want to break up the 1st line, but I would prefer a more balanced attack with Heinen or Bjork with 63 and 37 and Pasta on the 2nd line with 74 and 46. I think (as a team) they would be much harder to defend that way.
Please explain the first paragraph.
I’m a Rask fan, but Halak is clearly more locked in right now. Play the better goalie.
They played MTL last night without three of their Top 6 D, and still allowed only two goals (one soft). So, please excuse me if I don’t go out on the ledge.
The B’s FO and a lot of fans don’t want to break up the 1st line, but I would prefer a more balanced attack with Heinen or Bjork with 63 and 37 and Pasta on the 2nd line with 74 and 46. I think (as a team) they would be much harder to defend that way.
IDK seems pretty straight forward to me . The forward group of prospects aren't amounting to much we got Donato,Bjork, JFK, Senyshyn, Kuraly and so on and no one has been able to look like anything more than a JAG. Even Heinen who looked to be on his way last season seems to have regressed.
It's really nice to have a 1st line like we do but it can't stop there. There has to be more , otherwise all a team has to do is focus on those three and that is it. We can continue to beat non-playoff teams but as soon as the competition gets amped up it looks a mess.
They are targeting burn-out, retreads like Nash and Backes when it's obvious to every other GM that these guys are cooked and can't play in todays NHL. When a GM turns his back on a player (like the Bruins did with Lucic) read between the lines. There is a reason why the original team is passing on the player.
I disagree with basically everything in this postIDK seems pretty straight forward to me . The forward group of prospects aren't amounting to much we got Donato,Bjork, JFK, Senyshyn, Kuraly and so on and no one has been able to look like anything more than a JAG. Even Heinen who looked to be on his way last season seems to have regressed.
It's really nice to have a 1st line like we do but it can't stop there. There has to be more , otherwise all a team has to do is focus on those three and that is it. We can continue to beat non-playoff teams but as soon as the competition gets amped up it looks a mess.
They are targeting burn-out, retreads like Nash and Backes when it's obvious to every other GM that these guys are cooked and can't play in todays NHL. When a GM turns his back on a player (like the Bruins did with Lucic) read between the lines. There is a reason why the original team is passing on the player.
Thanks for proving my point.
You are saying that the B’s prospects are an “embarrassment”...and then rattle off 3/4 young players (several drafted in the mid rounds) that are on the NHL roster.
Under 24 guys on the NHL roster drafted in the last 5 years:
Pasta, DeBrusk, Heinen, Donato, Bjork, McAvoy, Carlo, Grizz
Young guys in PRO that have played NHL games, or are on the cusp:
Cehlarik, Lauzon, Vaakanainen, Frederic, Vladar, Zboril, Senyshyn, Fitzgerald.
In Juniors/NCAA/Euro they have Lauko, AA, Stud, Keyser, Berglund, Swayman.
I’m not sure that the Bruin’s have anything to be embarrassed about when it comes to their prospects and young players?
As far as the other stuff, the B’s pro personnel department needs to improve on their higher profile signings. They did well with the Bottom 6 guys like Nash, Schaller, etc., but whiffed on Backes, Beleskey. However, it should be noted that both ANA and STL wanted to retain those players, but not with the term the B’s were willing to give. FWIW, I liked both signings at the time, but did think Backes was 1-2 years too long. That’s what happens when you want to sign players away from their teams and why homegrown talent is so important.
Clearly we have a different definition of what a prospect is . A guy like Pasta who has 265 games played is a prospect? Geez what a stretch, let me guess , Chara is prospect too.
I’ll say what I said last November they are deep on D and have elite forward skill
I’m figuring from around November 5 to April 5 they have a top 5 record in the league
That’s 5 months
I’ll bring this back April 5 to see how I did
I’m more worried Tampa lost 7-1 to Arizona
They got serious issues. Not
Sad but true.
What we thought was an embarrassment of riches in prospects is turning out to be just an embarrassment .
Despite a 6-3-2 record there is plenty to be concerned about with this team. They have only beat non-playoff teams. As soon as the competition goes up just a notch, they falter.
Bad decisions everywhere you look. From FO, to coaching to decisions on ice. Rask has had little success against the Habs and Price his entire career. Mean while Halak has been hot, would be motivated to beat his former team . It was just to obvious to anyone but Cassidy or whoever made that stupid decision . You gotta win the Divisional games. Cant be ****ing around experimenting.
Hate to be all doom and gloom but there is little to get excited about with this team past the 1st line.
I did and found the post BUT they ended up better then I wrotethink you said about the same last year and were correct. Eerie how this team has shown some similar issues to begin this year as last outside of, I believe their record which is far more promising compared to last year where I think after about the same number of games they were sub .500
Injuries, depth was challenged as there seemed to be chemistry issues, Tuukka struggling etc...
One thing that I hope is that the kids start to produce, saw a nice game from Donato and Bjork IMO last night, Debrusk and Heinen have been playing better but the B`s need these kids to produce.
Like to see more from Moore but also understanding that the adjustment period surely takes more than a training camp and 1/8th of a season.
The loss last night was terribly frustrating and I recall a few losses to the Habs over the years where many would absolutely hammer Claude for a dud of a game on national television vs their most hated opponent. Honestly, wasn`t much of a fan of Cassidy`s last night either, I didn`t see any change to the approach during the course of the game. It was clear what the Habs were doing defensively yet the boys just kept trying to do the exact same thing over and over again expecting different results.
And while I understand the frustration with Backes when he`s in the lineup, he and Heinen and literally the only guys who stand in front of the net and try to make life tough for opposing goalies, the rest of the boys all start in front, then once the shot is let go, they shift to the side just enough so the goalie gets a clear view as they try to tip it, not good enough.
They`ll be fine, but a Saturday night game on national TV vs the Habs and that`s the effort? Ugly
I did and found the post BUT they ended up better then I wrote
I never saw them lose live in the regular season so my opinion was based on a lot of positive things
Healthy this team is top 5 in my judgement in the backend including goalies
Rask is notorious streak player and when he gets in that zone behind that D and that top line they can run off 13 wins in 15 games and that’s what will happen