Okay topic aside, who really cares what happens over a 2 game sample size. People who use this kind of crap to try and prove their point look incredibly silly. This thread is the perfect example of what has been happening this year. One person says, hey Dahlin is good and then 80 Dallas fans rush the thread and spend the next 2 pages **** talking him. Want a perfect example:
You literally said something that you later admitted you likely knew was wrong. Then why post it? Because all you wanted to do was exaggerate and trash on Dahlin. How can anyone have a genuine conversation when you guys spout false information and then later admit you knew they were false when you spouted them?
But yea, you guys are right Heiskanen is better than Dahlin by literally every measure known to man, my mistake.