hockeyfish
Registered User
Cap wise, it might be better to keep Stuart. Good odds he is never healthy enough to play and just gets the LTIR if needed.
Rumor: AVS Proposals/Rumors/Free Agents & Roster Moves (related topics)
- Thread starter RockLobster
- Start date
- Status
Cap wise, it might be better to keep Stuart. Good odds he is never healthy enough to play and just gets the LTIR if needed.
RockLobster
King in the North
BoxOfChocolates
Registered User
- Mar 7, 2010
- 11,397
- 1,541
If we did it this summer, it would be 4 years at 1.8 (so fall 2016 - spring 2020 )
Not if we wait a year and do it in 2017. But it would be 4 years if we did it right away.
Im just going off of General Fanager.
What hes not telling you is what 'prospect' means, much easier to look at that trade with that part undefined lmao.
tigervixxxen
Optimism=Delusional
True, only they would know how likely that is. If there's a good chance I agree.
Bender
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2002
- 17,354
- 8,658
I think Rantanen gets called-up after the Outdoor Game + Trade Deadline unless we somehow acquire Drouin or something like that.
Imagine they acquired Drouin then called up HW96 and Zadorov?? Nice jolt for the playoff push.
Ahh, this makes sense. Can we actually absorb that contract next year even without Stuart?
I guess the question is if they could still add Radulov if they did that, which I'd guess the answer is no.
- Dec 2, 2007
- 17,298
- 2,260
I suppose it wouldn't be as bad if they dumped Stuart in the process. Makes Carle's relative cap hit 1.9 next year, 1.8 the two years after.
Still not a fan of handicapping ourselves with that cap though. Stuart can go on LTIR. Carle can't. We have about 20mil in room next year before re-signings and if the cap stands still. That puts us in a tight spot next season.
tigervixxxen
Optimism=Delusional
Watch us acquire Drouin, and still leave both of them to play together in the AHL with Zadorov to lead SA. Then Berra comes back, and Pickard is sent back down.
Mikko, Drouin, Zadorov, and Pickard all somehow end up playing in SA lol
Cousin Eddie
You Serious Clark?
- Nov 3, 2006
- 40,152
- 37,330
The Ducks were allowed to send Wagner to the AHL (which they did).
I didn't realize this was allowed but this makes me think that Columbus would absolutely claim Bodnarchuk if waived to help out the AHL club.
I didn't realize this was allowed but this makes me think that Columbus would absolutely claim Bodnarchuk if waived to help out the AHL club.
We need someone else on the bench. I doubt the idea is for him to be the #6.
Zadorov would be good if they are willing to break up Beauch and EJ, but they don't seem to want to do that. But if that were to happen then Chuk slides down to a depth position.
With 21 players on the roster and now 49 contracts for the org there is no need to be dumping guys for no reason. Hell, we are even carrying 3 goalies still.
We can, but the addition at the forward ranks would be Rantanen, Drouin, and re-signing Matthais at most.
I do think they want Radulov in the off-season.
RockLobster
King in the North
So, in your scenario, the Avs would be keeping Carle for next season (2016-17)?
In that case, the question would be, is Carle's play this year indicative of his overall ability now, or is it just a bad situation for him in TB? Could he help the team in some capacity next season? (Again, those questions being asked in a hypothetical that the Avs acquire Carle and actually use him next season before buying him out)
hockeyfish
Registered User
It would be very close. Depends on the cap and how Barrie/Mackinnon/Grigorenko go.
Iceberg
Registered User
- May 4, 2002
- 4,786
- 1,120
I can't imagine he helps us, watching him regularly is painful as hell. It does not look like a type of thing that a change of scenery turns around.
Maybe that's just the unflinching hate that swells inside of me though when I see him on the ice for Tampa.
I see it more as getting a bad contract would decrease Drouin's value in a trade. Giving up the 1st would be like Avs "drafting" Drouin even if it would mean Avs have to give up a pretty good prospect in the trade as well.
Here is the thing though, Drouin is a coin toss to help us in any way this year as far as making the playoffs. Our first would have to be lottery protected IMO.
Foppa2118
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2003
- 52,384
- 31,627
Exactly that's why any deal involving a 1st or non Mikko/Bigras/Zadorov prospect shouldn't be a big deal at all. They'd be getting a 20 year old former #3 pick. They're significantly upgrading on any prospect they give up or draft.
Avalanche2133
Registered User
Yzerman already came out and said yesterday he wants to help the team now and for the playoff push. No futures ain't going to get it done. I just don't think we match up good on a Douin trade. We have nothing on our current roster that can help Tampa now that we would be willing to give up.
Closest thing I can think of is Grig, Comeau but it would take more than that and 1st to get Drouin.
Pretty sure we are going to call up Rantanen today or tomorrow the. Trade for a bottom pair defenseman or a number 4 at most so Holden slides down to 5 with Bigras.
Closest thing I can think of is Grig, Comeau but it would take more than that and 1st to get Drouin.
Pretty sure we are going to call up Rantanen today or tomorrow the. Trade for a bottom pair defenseman or a number 4 at most so Holden slides down to 5 with Bigras.
hockeyfish
Registered User
Even that 1.8 million next year is extremely important to them. Especially if they won't trade Stamkos.
- Status
Ad
Upcoming events
-
Gold Medal 2024 IIHF WORLD CHAMPION - PICK ONLY ONE TEAMWagers: 7Staked: $36,600.00Event closes- Updated:
-
-
-
-