AlphaBravo
Registered User
It's a confusing time in a lot of ways as a hockey fan and Kings fan. We see the league has changed to a speedier game but do we try to follow or do we try to create an identity of our own?
We tried following the trends for much of the late 90s (Matt Zultek) and that didn't pay off. What was eventually successful was creating an identity of our own. This has also worked for teams like the Canadiens, Devils and even the Stars to a degree.
Yet, with the rule changes and the league moving away from physical play, I have to wonder if that is still a viable solution?
I believe it still can be, but until we're able to really evaluate what we have in our system and how to build around their strengths, it seems like this teams future is really in limbo.
I don't think we need to necessary follow the trend. Although the cup winning teams were physical and played heavy, our success came from a strong puck possession play. Without puck possession, the Kings physical/heavy game would not win us the cups.
The Kings need to keep a puck possession/puck hound style of hockey going forward, which left our system when Sutter was fired. That does not mean we can't have a fast/skilled team as well. I just don't want us to employ a run and gun system, which in my opinion is not a recipe for success.
I look at the Kings young players (Kempe, Wagner, AI, Gundstrom, and Luff) and they play a possession/puck hound style. Mix in skill/talent in the top 6 to complement these great bottom 6 players, and add a coach that can emphasize puck possession, and I think we will be competitive again.