CokenoPepsi
Registered User
- Oct 28, 2016
- 4,911
- 2,364
Why wouldn’t Mcdavid be trying?The way some people see things is funny. McDavid hasn't even starting playing for real and he's only 6 points back meanwhile Kucherov is doing all he can and is only 6 points ahead. Wait until McDavid starts trying. Funny stuff.
No reason but that's the gist of what some posters were saying. "Wait till McDavid gets going then he'll blow everyone out of the water" ... things like that.Why wouldn’t Mcdavid be trying?
That’s nit a suggestion that he’s “not trying”. That’s for the historical fact that he gets more productive in the back half of seasons than in the front half of them.No reason but that's the gist of what some posters were saying. "Wait till McDavid gets going then he'll blow everyone out of the water" ... things like that.
Individually McDavid is on another level. But Kucherov has much more support which makes it very hard for McDavid to gain ground. Tampa juts scores a lot more. This is not really to take anything away from Kucherov who is extremely talented.Fact of the matter is Kucherov had only 8 less points than Mcdavid last year and has 6 more points this year. So Mcdavid has scored 2 more points in the last 1.5 seasons. So Mcdavid is not on another level
You mean he starts to score more when his team is mathematically eliminated from playoff contention and have nothing else to play for? Just like last season.That’s nit a suggestion that he’s “not trying”. That’s for the historical fact that he gets more productive in the back half of seasons than in the front half of them.
You mean he starts to score more when his team is mathematically eliminated from playoff contention and have nothing else to play for? Just like last season.
I love when posters embarrass themselves and look stupid like this.You mean he starts to score more when his team is mathematically eliminated from playoff contention and have nothing else to play for? Just like last season.
That’s nit a suggestion that he’s “not trying”. That’s for the historical fact that he gets more productive in the back half of seasons than in the front half of them.
Individually McDavid is on another level. But Kucherov has much more support which makes it very hard for McDavid to gain ground. Tampa juts scores a lot more. This is not really to take anything away from Kucherov who is extremely talented.
That’s nit a suggestion that he’s “not trying”. That’s for the historical fact that he gets more productive in the back half of seasons than in the front half of them.
This actually takes something away from Kucherov. You can just as easily argue that being on a good team is a disadvantage to Kucherov. He certainly showed in 16/17 that he could score without nearly the amount of support he is getting this year. His PPG was in was only 6% lower than McDavid's on a worse team.
Why does everyone feel the need to come up with excuses for McDavid not being the points leader?
It's not an excuse. Kucherov has earned his place at the top of the heap. In the end of the day the Art Ross is strickly about the numbers. No analysis is necessary as to how they got there.
And in your own post you actually lend evidence to support what I am saying. 85 points in 74 games without the same type of support is exceptional. But he is now on pace for way more than that and I would be shocked if the added support was not a huge factor. And by support I am not talking about scoring by the third line guys. I am specifically speaking about the five guys who are on the ice with Kucherov. To get an assist someone has to score. If you have more guys on your line capable of putting the puck in the net and you are as talented as Kucherov you probably get more assists.
It's not an excuse. Kucherov has earned his place at the top of the heap. In the end of the day the Art Ross is strickly about the numbers. No analysis is necessary as to how they got there. But that is not what my post was responding to. It was the claim that Kucherov is on par with McDavid as a hockey player. I still believe that McDavid is in a different tier of player and I suspect almost everyone in the hockey world would as well. If you don't think so, so be it.
And in your own post you actually lend evidence to support what I am saying. 85 points in 74 games without the same type of support is exceptional. But he is now on pace for way more than that and I would be shocked if the added support was not a huge factor. And by support I am not talking about scoring by the third line guys. I am specifically speaking about the five guys who are on the ice with Kucherov. To get an assist someone has to score. If you have more guys on your line capable of putting the puck in the net and you are as talented as Kucherov you probably get more assists.
well Johnny hockey was up there last year then the 2nd half hit and he went downhill. until I see consistency he's not even close to mckannion, kuch or mcdavid
Gaudreau has come a long way. At the end of November, he was tied at 17th in scoring with 28 points (14 points back of then league-leader Rantanen).
From December 1st though, he's equal first in scoring alongside Kucherov with 40 points (Kuch in 20 games, Johnny in 21) and first in goals with 17 and equal-second with +21.
Well as of right now the oilers are tied in pts for a playoff spot so whatever he does for the time being is very impactful.You mean he starts to score more when his team is mathematically eliminated from playoff contention and have nothing else to play for? Just like last season.
I mean... There is a poster here who's name is DownGoesMcDavid. He literally made a username because he hates a player so much.never seen someone hate on a player like daver does with mcdavid, i think it should form some sort of psychological case study or thesis...