heysmilinstrange
Registered User
- Nov 10, 2016
- 3,321
- 4,768
The TSN article would have you believe Murray was a godsend and that Jarry and his stats this past season, didn't exist, or that if they did, it's because Jarry had an entirely different team in front of him.
Are you talking about this article from yesterday? It literally calls the Murray deal low-risk, moderate reward and only mentions Jarry to say that Murray lost the starter job to him. The article does mention Lundqvist and Price ... but only to say that they improved their performance throughout their twenties, and Murray might do that too, or might not. It's extremely even-handed.