Are the Devils really this good?
Prepare to be disappointed: it’s ~18%What are the odds of team finishing last picking first? It should be 50% IMO.
They never added the supplemental players, veterans, whether it be through shrewd trades or free agent signings, to support Hall, RNH, Eberle, and McDavid. The guys they did add were the wrong ones.The thing about Edmonton is that the same type of season letdown/lack of improvement could be repeated a number of times successively. I am not even being unkind, just realistic. It really could happen a few more times. I actually expect it more than not.
If you spend too much time thinking about the future without doing anything about the present, that's what you get.
They never added the supplemental players, veterans, whether it be through shrewd trades or free agent signings, to support Hall, RNH, Eberle, and McDavid. The guys they did add were the wrong ones.
Are the Devils really this good?
Worse than that, they didn't even draft the depth and role-players that may have allowed them to trade some of their top end talent for other top end talent.
From the 2007 draft onwards the Oilers have drafted 6 players outside the 1rst round who have gone on to play 100 NHL games. Only 2 of those have played more than 200; and a lot of those picks were high second rounders.
In the same time frame the Rangers (who I don't think are anything special when it comes to drafting) have also drafted 6 players who have played 100+ games, but 5 of them have played 200+ and 3 of them have played 400+.
Their inability to identify, draft and develop talent has completely screwed that club up, and now it appears they are going to waste the prime of one of the best young players that the game has seen.
I talked about this a few months back when there were concerns the Rangers could be going down the same path as the Oilers when it comes to a rebuild.
Outside of their first rounders, the Oilers have been poor at finding talent throughout the draft.
The only point I disagree with is the Rangers, but I (and others) have beaten that horse to death and have yet to really see a reasonable reply.
It's looking like Arizona and Detroit is our competition for the basement. Both teams look absolutely awful.
Ottawa has strong center depth and is still winning games despite being bitten by the injury bug. Chabot on defense is going to be great. They're going to be better than a lot of people thought.
Montreal is off to a good start, but how sustainable is it?
Buffalo isn't going to be a basement dweller this year.
The Rangers are going to make games tight because of their compete level and will steal games because of Lundqvist. The team is just so bereft of talent on offense and defense that I don't see them not being towards the bottom of the league standings. If the Rangers finish better than a bottom 5 team, it is because Lundqvist had a Vezina caliber season.
I have a feeling they make the playoffs or get close off a price bounce back yearMontreal is off to a good start, but how sustainable is it?
Hearing that if Nylander is traded, he may be headed to Minnesota.
Something around Dumba and Nylander, maybe.Hearing that if Nylander is traded, he may be headed to Minnesota.
Toronto would have to add.Something around Dumba and Nylander, maybe.
Makes sense.
For sure. The Sens will finish ahead of the Rangers. Chabot and the young forwards are solid. Tierney and DeMelo give that lineup some depth.Ottawa has strong center depth and is still winning games despite being bitten by the injury bug. Chabot on defense is going to be great. They're going to be better than a lot of people thought.