Discussion in 'New York Rangers' started by Krams, Jun 4, 2020.
With 1? No way. Now, a trade down to 2 or 3? That I'd consider
God that's a weak call.
And there's a weaker call. How could I possibly forget you're not allowed to breathe near Sindy.
for sure I’d try and do that first but if i couldn’t get something I wanted I’d just make the pick
They should have played “Boo”s for every time Montreal takes le penalty
At that point, you go BPA, and Lafreniere is very much that
Well the first 2 periods were fun, now it's the ref show.
Yeah what in the ever loving f*** is that all about?!?!
You know why
Yeah but still!!! Wtf?!?!
What a moronic pass haha
Man Scheifele went down like he was shot in the leg. He was my pick to light it up this round. Hope he's ok. Really hate to see leg/knee injuries like that
don't disagree with your point but what does lias anderson have to do with taking two way ncaa forwards? we haven't taken a NCAA bound forward with our top pick since chris kreider in 2009 (possibly out best pick until kakko). the last time we picked a forward that was already playing ncaa was 2004. so we don't have a trend of taking two way ncaa forwards. we have a trend of taking terrible forwards that aren't good at hockey. that is who we should avoid picking
The rarity of players being that good, even if they’re #1 overall? Literally over 50% of 1st overall picks since 2010 haven’t been as good.
I want to kick the scout that retired right after picking Lias in the Nuts.
Passing on Necas doesn't bother me that much, passing on Suzuki does.
PS in OT
I mean if that's really what was allowed to happen, the problems go much further than the retiring scout and you should be kicking a lot of Rangers staff before you get to him
Absolutely pathetic by Drouin
This is true, but for the sake of this conversation, hes the one I want to kick.
LOL at Drouin.
2 penalty shots, 0 shots on goal.
Montreal looks good, somehow
And they win.
Wish we competed at that level.
Separate names with a comma.