Strange deal. CHI gave away Patrick Sharp and stud D prospect Stephen Johns this summer and took back Daley and the borderline-useless Ryan Garbutt.
Now they're moving Daley for a defenseman who is worse just to save a couple dollars? If that's the motivation, that's another example of really poor cap management the last few years while Rockford overflows with talent and they sit there with Corey Crawford and Bryan Bickell sucking up $9.5m.
The Capitals are a damn good hockey team.
Happens when another team gifts you an elite forward for free + your youngsters kick in.
God I wish we could take advantage of a team or teams via favorable or lopsided trades. Knowing us, we will give up one of our top prospects for some useless vet.
When is the last time DM did that?God I wish we could take advantage of a team or teams via favorable or lopsided trades. Knowing us, we will give up one of our top prospects for some useless vet.
Rundblad on waivers
Rundblad on waivers
World-beating Rundblad, on waivers? Unpossible.
RHD? Let's take him back. Vermette, Gordon, Tiks, Rundblad, am I missing anybody?
Maybe DM/Tip were correct about Runblad and world beating Gormley after all It is really too bad, because we were counting on one of or both of them to be in top 4 rolls for us. I am glad we got Elliot for Gormley too. If Elliot can play a little better in his own end, his offensive skills will keep him in the line up. I like his jump, reminds me of Yandle a little, a guy who can make plays.
While I'm not sure if I would make that argument, one could debate that Rundblad and Gormley may be where they are now due to poor development.
While I'm not sure if I would make that argument, one could debate that Rundblad and Gormley may be where they are now due to poor development. I think it's something worth considering when you look at our blueline and other than OEL who was a talent before we ever got our hands on him, we haven't really developed too many defensemen in recent history to get excited about. Murphy & Stone would be the best examples, and I'm not sure there are many of us who are concluding them as a success either. They are two names that are often thrown around as hoping someone thinks they are better than they are so we can get an upgrade.
I couldn't disagree more. These kids were playing hockey since they were knee high to a grasshopper. As the kids get older the competition gets better and the weaknesses of the player shows. Most don't get a sniff at playing pro. NHL organizations know how to develop players, some better than others, but it is the player and their individual talent level dictates if they can play at a higher level. The player is given direction, but it's up to them to make it happen.